I suggest a haplography to solve the difficulty of the line.
|
|
There are mistakes of the visual type, such as haplography and dittography.
|
|
There are mistakes of the visual type, such as haplography and dittography.
|
|
Examples of the second type are treatments on dittography, haplography, harmonization, and itacisms.
|
|
Examples of the second type are treatments on dittography, haplography, harmonization, and itacisms.
|
|
The other case occurs in Gudea's address to Ningirsu and it seems to me that it was due to haplography.
|
|
Haplography is writing once what should be written twice, such as defendum rather than defendendum, and dittography is the opposite.
|
|
Haplography is writing once what should be written twice, such as defendum rather than defendendum, and dittography is the opposite.
|
|
Wasserman's suggestion of a scribal mistake or haplography would eliminate a problem and unify the collection of examples for nominal hendiadys.
|
|
The omission referred to as haplography occurs when text is missing owing to lines which have a similar ending in a manuscript.
|
|
In the apparatus of Trounce's edition, dittography occurs at line 266, haplography at line 352, and there are numerous erasures and corrections within the text.
|
|
In the apparatus of Trounce's edition, dittography occurs at line 266, haplography at line 352, and there are numerous erasures and corrections within the text.
|
|
Haplography, or the accidental omission of a letter or word that occurs twice in close proximity, can be found, for example, in the Dead Sea Scroll text of Isaiah.
|
|
This is an intentional omission, and thus not haplography, which is unintentional omission of a duplicate. In the case of an interrogative or exclamatory sentence ending with an abbreviation, a question or exclamation mark can still be added (e.g. "Are you Gabriel Gama, Jr.?").
|
|
The term haplography is commonly used in the field of textual criticism to refer to the phenomenon of a scribe's, copyist's or translator's inadvertently skipping from one word or phrase to a similar word or phrase further on in the text, and omitting everything in between.This usage can be seen at It is considered to be a form of parablepsis.
|
|
Dittography is the accidental, erroneous act of repeating a letter, word, phrase or combination of letters by a scribe or copyist.Paul D. Wegner, A student's guide to textual criticism of the Bible: its history, methods, and results, InterVarsity Press, 2006, p. 48. The term is used in the field of textual criticism. The opposite phenomenon, in which a copyist omits text by skipping from a word or phrase to a similar word or phrase further on, is known as haplography.
|
|
Haplography (from Greek: haplo- 'single' + -graphy 'writing'), also known as lipography, is a scribal or typographical error where a letter or group of letters that should be written twice is written once. It is not to be confused with haplology, where a phoneme is omitted to prevent two similar sounds from occurring consecutively: the former is a textual error, while the latter is a phonological process. In English, a common haplographical mistake is the rendering of consecutive letters between morphemes as a single letter. Many commonly misspelled words have this form.
|
|
For example, misspell is often misspelled as mispell. The etymology of the word misspell is the affix "mis-" plus the root "spell", their bound morpheme has two consecutive s's, one of which is often erroneously omitted. The opposite of haplography is dittography. Other examples of words liable to be written haplographically in different languages are: German Rollladen ("shutters", from roll + Laden) which requires an uncommon sequence of three l‘s and is often spelt Rolladen, or Arabic takyīf تكييف ("air conditioning"), which would require a sequence of two semivowels y (one as a true semivowel, and another as a device to mark long ī) and is often spelt as takīf تكيف, with only one.
|
|
639–642 Because it is generally dated between 350 BCE and Alexander the Great's conquest of Persia, around 333 BCE,Fried, Lisbeth S., A silver coin of Yohanan Hakkôhen, Transeuphratène 26 (2003) pp. 67, 85 (pdf) the coin is usually attributed to a second high priest called Johanan, who is not mentioned in the Bible. Thus, the coin seems to lend support to the hypothesis by Frank Moore Cross from 1975 that there were two subsequent father/son pairs of high priests called Johanan and Jaddua, the latter pair of which was accidentally omitted from the biblical text because of haplography. However, Lisbeth Fried has challenged this late dating of the coin and has suggested a date between 378 and 368 BCE.
|
|