But few New Yorkers seem to think either narrative is wholly true.
|
|
Any given opinion that someone expresses is either wholly true, partly true or false.
|
|
But one of the proposed solutions — giving pregnant women information about hospital outcomes to facilitate better choices — while meritorious on its face, creates an implication that is not wholly true.
|
|
"Your way of seeing things, including yourself, seems not wholly true or right or your own, and is in dire need of a refresh," writes one of our advice columnists.
|
|
Democrats have suggested that's not wholly true and railed against the process, pointing to the fact that only nine people were interviewed despite dozens of names of possible witnesses being put forward.
|
|
I suppose what I'm trying to get at is that your way of seeing things, including yourself, seems not wholly true or right or your own, and is in dire need of a refresh.
|
|
That belief is not wholly true, of course: Amazon for one has recently been making a huge effort to improve trust, by going after dodgy reviewers and setting up systems to halt the trafficking of counterfeit goods.
|
|
Her final admission to NPR, however, rings wholly true: her memory of sitting on the dais at the inauguration in January, listening to Trump rail at politicians like her and thinking this is, indeed, "a surreal experience."
|
|
It is primarily from a > combination of these facts that the argument for inerrancy comes.McRea, WJ, > A book to die for, Clements publishing, 2002. And Grenz has: > Because God cannot lie and because scripture is inspired by God, the Bible > must be wholly true. This syllogism may be valid for establishing inerrancy, > but it cannot define the concept.
|
|
Repington wrote that it was "the worst defeat in the history of the Army". Bonar Law claimed in a House of Commons debate (23 April) that Haig and Petain had agreed the extension of the British line, which was not wholly true as in January 1918 the Supreme War Council had ordered a longer extension than Haig and Petain had agreed between themselves in December 1917, only leaving them to sort out the details.
|
|
In classical logic, propositions are typically unambiguously considered as being true or false. For instance, the proposition one is both equal and not equal to itself is regarded as simply false, being contrary to the Law of Noncontradiction; while the proposition one is equal to one is regarded as simply true, by the Law of Identity. However, some mathematicians, computer scientists, and philosophers have been attracted to the idea that a proposition might be more or less true, rather than wholly true or wholly false. Consider My coffee is hot.
|
|
In addition, the banner suggests that the alliance between Los Zetas and the Beltrán Leyva Cartel remains intact as of 2012 despite the losses it lived in 2008. The message also suggests the differences in the modus operandi of Los Zetas and the Sinaloa Cartel, because as authors of InSight Crime allege, the Zetas have a reputation of operating through extortion, kidnappings, robberies, and other illicit activities; in contrast, the Sinaloa Cartel is known simply for drug trafficking. (Both assertions are not wholly true, but often reflect a popular sentiment.) Guzmán attempted to take over Nuevo Laredo after the capture of the Gulf Cartel leader, Osiel Cárdenas Guillén, in 2003. Nevertheless, Guzmán retreated after a few years of bloody turf wars.
|
|
His famous song, "To All You Ladies Now at Land", was written, according to Prior, on the night before the victory gained over foggy Opdam off Harwich (3 June 1665). Samuel Johnson, with the remark that seldom any splendid story is wholly true, said that the Earl of Orrery had told him it was only retouched on that occasion. In 1667, Pepys lamented that Sackville had lured Nell Gwyn away from the theatre, and that with Sedley the two kept merry house at Epsom. Next year the king was paying court to Gwyn, and her Charles the Second, as she called him (Charles Hart, a former lover, being her Charles the First), was sent on a "sleeveless errand" into France to be out of the way.
|
|
In the second chapter, J. S. Mill attempts to prove his claim from the first chapter that opinions ought never to be suppressed.Mill 1859, ch. 2 Looking to the consequences of suppressing opinions, he concludes that opinions ought never to be suppressed, stating, "Such prejudice, or oversight, when it [i.e. false belief] occurs, is altogether an evil; but it is one from which we cannot hope to be always exempt, and must be regarded as the price paid for an inestimable good." He claims that there are three sorts of beliefs that can be had—wholly false, partly true, and wholly true—all of which, according to Mill, benefit the common good:Mill 1859, p. 72 Mill spends a large portion of the chapter discussing implications of and objections to the policy of never suppressing opinions.
|
|
His family were all buried at the Italian Club of Tampa Cemetery Despite evidence Licata had a pre-existing history of mental illness, police and the press made unattributed claims that he was "addicted" to marijuana. On October 17, 1933, the Tampa Bay Times wrote: > W. D. Bush, city chief detective, said he had made an investigation prior to > the crime and learned the slayer had been addicted to smoking marijuana > cigarettes for more than six months. However, a day later the Chief of Tampa Police Department downplayed the role the drug had in the murders, although he pledged himself to the cause of marijuana prohibition: An October 20, 1933, editorial on page six of the Tampa Morning Tribune was entitled "Stop This Murderous Smoke". The editorial writer called for the prohibition of marijuana: > [I]t may or may not be wholly true that the pernicious marijuana cigarette > is responsible for the murderous mania of a Tampa young man in exterminating > all the members of his family within his reach — but whether or not the > poisonous mind-wrecking weed is mainly accountable for the tragedy its sale > should not be and should never have been permitted here or elsewhere.
|
|