Upfront costs of such an undertaking weighs against future savings.
|
|
"Ahead of the finely balanced MPC meeting this week, this likely weighs against a cut in the near term," they added.
|
|
The memo says that officers may decide an illegal entry conviction weighs against deciding to show discretion in an immigrant's favor.
|
|
First, remembering that these two traditions inform American politics weighs against efforts to rewrite history in ways that downplay conflict and controversy.
|
|
Industry experts say Safran's partially state-owned structure weighs against making hostile offers, a tactic only rarely used in France and one which causes particular concerns in the country's close-knit and conservative defense sector.
|
|
And low-skilled jobs in a city like San Francisco pay some of the highest wages in the country; the minimum wage here is twice what it is in much of America, a real benefit that weighs against the high housing costs.
|
|
The least likely was Mark. While this weighs against the Griesbach proposal and favors the Farrer (see list in next section,) he does not claim any proposals are ruled out.
|
|
Bouhouche's physical size and facial features not fitting any description compiled from early unmasked encounters with the three main (possibly only) members of the Brabant killers gang weighs against his active participation, especially in 1985.
|
|
The case has been cited as an example of the principle that when the purpose of the copy is mainly financial gain, that weighs against the fair use finding. The Transcript had the intent, if not the effect, of fulfilling the demand for the original work. It is also an example of a finding that an abstract that summarizes narrow excerpts of creative expression from the original should be protected under fair use, but not if the excerpts appropriate most of the most creative and original elements.
|
|
Some evidence weighs against climate change as a valid hypothesis as applied to Australia. It has been shown that the prevailing climate at the time of extinction (40,000–50,000 BP) was similar to that of today, and that the extinct animals were strongly adapted to an arid climate. The evidence indicates that all of the extinctions took place in the same short time period, which was the time when humans entered the landscape. The main mechanism for extinction was probably fire (started by humans) in a then much less fire-adapted landscape.
|
|
Walter's brother, Edward, said that Walter renamed the Fish holdings after acquiring the property in 1876, claiming "he would make an Empire of it someday." However, in writing to his sister on November 25, 1876, Herbert Hislop stated: " ...it was called the Empire Ranch before we bought it and we have not altered the name." Other accounts suggest that either Fish called the quarter-section spread "the Empire" in a promotional flurry to make it more attractive, or that William Wakefield named the ranch after the nearby Empire Mountains. The evidence weighs against Edward Vail's romanticized version.
|
|
Accolade, Dish argued that the copies were fair use because they were ultimately used for the user's fair use purpose (In Sega, the Ninth Circuit had judged that copying code for reverse engineering purpose was "intermediate copying," and protected by fair use.). The Court denied Dish's argument because the purpose and the effects on the economy of QA copies were fundamentally different from those of reverse engineering. The Court examined the four factors of fair use as follows: #Purpose and Character of the Use: the commercial purpose and non-transformative uses of the QA copies weighs against a finding of fair use. #Nature of the Copyrighted Work: the creative nature of the Fox's copyrighted works weighted against a finding of fair use.
|
|
According to law professor Lino Graglia of the University of Texas, even if Wong Kim Ark settled the status of children of legal residents, it did not do so for children of illegal residents; Graglia asserts that the case weighs against automatic birthright for illegal immigrants because the Court denied such citizenship for an analogous group, namely "children of alien enemies, born during and within their hostile occupation". Countering this view, Garrett Epps—a professor of law at the University of Baltimore—has stated that "In the case of United States v. Wong Kim Ark, the United States Supreme Court held that this guarantee [of birthright citizenship] applies to children of foreigners present on American soil, even if their parents are not American citizens and indeed are not eligible to become U.S. citizens." Epps further notes that "as a practical matter, the American-born children receive recognition of their citizenship regardless of the immigration status of their parents."Epps (2010), p. 333.
|
|