How to use suppress the speech of in a sentence? Find typical usage patterns (collocations)/phrases/context for "suppress the speech of" and check conjugation/comparative form for "suppress the speech of". Mastering all the usages of "suppress the speech of" from sentence examples published by news publications.
"I can't tell from this statement whether they're promising to suppress the speech of someone like Emma Sulkowicz," she said.
|
|
Democrats are eager to use campaign finance laws as a tool to intimidate and suppress the speech of their political opponents.
|
|
"It is outrageous that the Chinese Communist Party is using its economic power to suppress the speech of Americans inside the United States," wrote the lawmakers.
|
|
Everyone has a right to be heard, but you also don't have a right to create these fake amplification campaigns that really suppress the speech of other people.
|
|
"It is outrageous that the Chinese Communist Party is using its economic power to suppress the speech of Americans inside the United States," wrote a bipartisan group of eight lawmakers in a Wednesday letter to Silver.
|
|
The power of governments and other powerful interests to censor and suppress the speech of disfavored groups is already so great that it would be foolish to arrogate to such interests even greater powers to control the speech and expression of citizens.
|
|
Nadell penned another letter as president, along with the Association for Jewish Studies executive board to Israeli ambassador to the United States Ron Dermer expressing concern over amendments made to the Israeli Entry into Israel Law. The law would prohibit the issuing of visas to foreign nationals who have made "public calls for boycotting Israel." For Nadell, who herself identifies as a free-speech advocate, an attempt to suppress the speech of others would be seen as a deep concern. Nadell voiced similar free-speech concerns in 2017 before the House Judiciary Committee during a hearing on antisemitism on college campuses.
|
|
Ken McVay, an American resident in Canada, was disturbed by the efforts of organizations like the Simon Wiesenthal Center to suppress the speech of the Holocaust deniers, feeling that it was better to confront them openly than to try to censor them. On the Usenet newsgroup alt.revisionism he began a campaign of "truth, fact, and evidence", working with other participants on the newsgroup to uncover factual information about the Holocaust and counter the arguments of the deniers by proving them to be based upon misleading evidence, false statements, and outright lies. He founded the Nizkor Project to expose the activities of the Holocaust deniers, who responded to McVay with personal attacks, slander, and death threats.
|
|
The paradox of tolerance is important in the discussion of what, if any, boundaries are to be set on freedom of speech. Raphael Cohen-Almagor, in the chapter "Popper's Paradox of Tolerance and Its Modification" of The Boundaries of Liberty and Tolerance: The Struggle Against Kahanism in Israel (1994), departs from Popper's limitation to imminent threat of physical harm to extend the argument for censorship to psychological harm, and asserts that to allow freedom of speech to those who would use it to eliminate the very principle upon which that freedom relies is paradoxical. Michel Rosenfeld, in the Harvard Law Review in 1987, stated: "it seems contradictory to extend freedom of speech to extremists who ... if successful, ruthlessly suppress the speech of those with whom they disagree." Rosenfeld points out that the Western European democracies and the United States have opposite approaches to the question of tolerance of hate speech, in that where most Western European nations place legal penalties on the circulation of extremely intolerant or fringe political materials (e.g.
|
|
No results under this filter, show 9 sentences.