How to use plausibilities in a sentence? Find typical usage patterns (collocations)/phrases/context for "plausibilities" and check conjugation/comparative form for "plausibilities". Mastering all the usages of "plausibilities" from sentence examples published by news publications.
Has he not acquired a little of the delusive plausibilities of lawyers?
|
|
More analysis, including about the plausibilities of both grammars, can be made empirically by applying constituency tests.
|
|
International Journal of Hindu Studies, volume 1, issue 2, pages 401–420. . Online version accessed on 2010-01-20. Jeffrey J. Kripal (January 1998), Pale Plausibilities: A Preface for the Second Edition [of Kali's Child]. University of Chicago Press.
|
|
Jeffrey J. Kripal (January 1998), Pale Plausibilities: A Preface for the Second Edition [of Kali's Child]. University of Chicago Press. Online version available at Kripal's Rice University website, accessed on 2010-01-13. and several essays and rebuttals, but as of 2004 the controversy still continued.
|
|
The two scarlet threads running all through Robinson’s work since The Translator’s Turn (1991) are somaticity and performativity—the imperfect social regulation of human communicative and other interaction as ‘’inwardly felt’’ (the somatic) and ‘’outwardly staged’’ (the performative).See Zhu (2012: chs. 4–5), and "An Interview with Professor Douglas Robinson ," Chinese Translators Journal 2 (2009): 39–44. In his more recent work he has begun to theorize "icosis" as the becoming-true or becoming-real of group opinion, through a mass persuasion/plausibilization processRobinson coined "icosis" from Aristotle's eikos "plausible" and ta eikota "the plausibilities," and his insistence that, given a choice between a story that is true but implausible and a story that is plausible but untrue, we will tend to choose the latter, because plausibility is organized by the group.
|
|
J. J. C. Smart argues that the distinction between atheism and agnosticism is unclear, and many people who have passionately described themselves as agnostics were in fact atheists. He writes that this mischaracterization is based on an unreasonable philosophical skepticism that would not allow us to make any claims to knowledge about the world. He proposes instead the following analysis: > Let us consider the appropriateness or otherwise of someone (call him > 'Philo') describing himself as a theist, atheist or agnostic. I would > suggest that if Philo estimates the various plausibilities to be such that > on the evidence before him the probability of theism comes out near to one > he should describe himself as a theist and if it comes out near zero he > should call himself an atheist, and if it comes out somewhere in the middle > he should call himself an agnostic.
|
|
No results under this filter, show 6 sentences.