I find myself deriding the trust fund babies, though not in so many words.
|
|
The Constitution, Justice Thomas added, confirmed that principle, if not in so many words.
|
|
We're told Post Malone said -- not in so many words -- "DUH!!" and raced to the studio to get it done.
|
|
The argument Trump is making, though not in so many words, is: Well, John Lewis, what about black-on-black crime?
|
|
Last week, Sacha Baron Cohen made the case —although not in so many words — that the United States needs its own version of Singapore's law.
|
|
Such is the comical and sometimes philosophical nature of many of the works on display in this exhibition, "Not in So Many Words," on view until May 10.
|
|
"Not in So Many Words" focuses on art that employs text — letters, words, sentences, fragments and the spoken word — and undermines the notion that art is a primarily visual medium.
|
|
In the wake of the coronavirus outbreak, which is wreaking havoc on the airline industry, American Airlines has not yet asked for a bailout — at least not in so many words.
|
|
What you won't hear them say, not in so many words, is that they're the ones pandering to a pacifist, progressive base — because that's where the heart and soul of the new Democratic Party seems to be.
|
|
It holds (although admittedly not in > so many words) that the Bill of Rights must be applied directly to the > common law wherever appropriate. It should be directly applied, in other > words, in many (perhaps most) of the horizontal cases that have previously > been treated as indirect application cases (ie, cases involving private > litigants relying on common-law provisions).Currie and De Waal Handbook 46.
|
|
His prestige was restored unwittingly by Gandhi, who had been released from prison on medical grounds in May 1944 and had met Jinnah in Bombay in September. There he offered the Muslim leader a plebiscite in the Muslim areas after the war to see whether they wanted to separate from the rest of India. Essentially, it was an acceptance of the principle of Pakistan – but not in so many words. Jinnah demanded that the exact words be said; Gandhi refused and the talks broke down.
|
|
The Court began by examining the language of the statute, concluding that although the Passport Act did not in so many words confer upon the Secretary a power to revoke or to deny passport applications, it was beyond dispute that the Secretary had the power to deny a passport for reasons not specified in the statutes. A consistent administrative construction of the 1926 Act must be followed by the courts "`unless there are compelling indications that it is wrong.'" Matters intimately related to foreign policy and national security were rarely proper subjects for judicial intervention particularly in light of the "broad rule-making authority granted in the 1926 Act," citing Zemel. It then surveyed passport law and administrative policy and practice from 1835 to 1966, concluding that the history of passport controls since the earliest days of the Republic showed congressional recognition of Executive authority to withhold passports on the basis of substantial reasons of national security and foreign policy.
|
|