Imagine the officers' surprise when they got to the chilling root of the matter in question.
|
|
He himself has expressed clearly enough that values, of any kind, are not the matter in question.
|
|
It appears that T-Mobile and Google have now come to an agreement over the matter in question.
|
|
Choosing H2O as the matter in question, I looked for phrases that included ice, water and steam that hadn't been overused already.
|
|
If Mueller truly believed such conclusions are impermissible, then why did he not submit the matter in question to the Justice Department inspector general?
|
|
The matter in question is the products that trade at the inverse of the market's "fear gauge," the Cboe Volatility Index, which trades as VIX.
|
|
The Solicitor General of the State shall also attend and those senior positions with the rank of Secretary of State or Under Secretary who are summoned by the President of the Commission by reason of the matter in question.
|
|
The New York Times.Matt Bai. All The Truth Is Out: The Week That Politics Went Tabloid. Knopf (September 30, 2014) Smears are also effective in diverting attention away from the matter in question and onto a specific individual or group.
|
|
They would take time in quiet, each individual writing his or her sense of "God's direction" on the matter in question. They would then check with each other, seeking consensus on the action to take. Some church leaders criticized this practice. Others supported it.
|
|
Ohio Civil Rights Comm'n v. Dayton Christian Schools, Inc. was a U.S. Supreme Court case involving this commission regarding a sex discrimination case in which a ruling was made that a court had ruled on the matter in question in error without giving sufficient time for the Commission to conclude an investigation.
|
|
It was emphasized by the Court that all constitutional legal challenges to legislation should follow the same approach: # the pith and substance of the provincial law and the federal law should be examined to ensure that they are both validly enacted laws and to determine the nature of the overlap, if any, between them. # the applicability of the provincial law to the federal undertaking or matter in question must be resolved with reference to the doctrine of interjurisdictional immunity. #only if both the provincial law and the federal law have been found to be valid pieces of legislation, and only if the provincial law is found to be applicable to the federal matter in question, then both statutes must be compared to determine whether the overlap between them constitutes a conflict sufficient to trigger the application of the doctrine of federal paramountcy.
|
|
Any group of twenty members may interpellate. The motion of censure may be for the whole government or any particular minister. The motion takes the form of a question that is replied to by the responsible minister. If the parliament decides to approve the motion of censure, the committee responsible for the matter in question formulates the motion, which is then passed by the parliament.
|
|
Mondo is capable of taking on the properties of any organic or inorganic material with which he comes into contact. When using his power, Mondo is able to grow in mass with an assumed proportionate growth in strength to superhuman levels. Mondo can absorb matter into his body, gaining the mass, appearance, and other properties of the matter in question. This change will remain until Mondo's body "digests" the organic matter, which is then disintegrated.
|
|
However, Heward was marked by a readiness to learn from other Christians if the matter in question could be proven by Scripture. A learning process in his magazines is clearly visible. Many of his sermons, preached either to the congregation in the "Meeting room" in Forest Gate (East London) or in other places, were transcribed as he spoke and were published as "Typewritten Notes"P.W. Heward: Thoughts from the Word of God, Vol.
|
|
Then the > state's priest, if it is an official consultation, or the father of the > family, in a private one, offers prayer to the gods and looking up towards > heaven picks up three strips, one at a time, and, according to which sign > they have previously been marked with, makes his interpretation. If the lots > forbid an undertaking, there is no deliberation that day about the matter in > question. If they allow it, further confirmation is required by taking > auspices.Birley (1999:42).
|
|
The tribunal was established under the Residential Tribunal Act 1998 (NSW). It had jurisdiction under the Community Land Management Act 1989 (NSW), Residential Parks Act 1998 (NSW), Residential Tenancies Act 1987 (NSW), Retirement Villages Act 1999 (NSW) and the Strata Schemes Management Act 1996 (NSW). The tribunal was to conduct proceedings with as little formality and technicality and with as much expedition as the requirements of the matter in question permitted. The tribunal was not bound by the rules of evidence.
|
|
As > for the matter in question, the occasion of this inauguration, it will be my > honour to organise to the best of my ability, the better the honour for > future generations. After this the illustrations will be seen in Ōsaka where > all the separate designs will be displayed. With all due respect to you my > three noble friends then you will be received with appropriate speeches of > thanks and honour. I will measure the time preciously until your response > for this article with the family crest which will in the named theatre be > honoured.
|
|
Even when the facts behind smears and campaigns have been demonstrated to lack proper foundation, the tactic is often effective because the target's reputation remains tarnished regardless of the truth. Smears are also effective in diverting attention away from the matter in question. The target of the smear has to address the additional issue of correcting the false information, rather than being able to focus on their response to the original issue. Common negative campaign techniques include painting an opponent as soft on criminals, dishonest, corrupt, or a danger to the nation.
|
|
The king was free to choose councillors, but was bound to decide on governmental matters only in presence of the Privy Council, or a subset thereof, and after report of the councillor responsible for the matter in question. The councillor had to countersign a royal decision, unless it was unconstitutional, whereby it gained legal force. The councillor was legally responsible for his advice and was obliged to note his dissension in case he did not agree with the king's decision. This constitution put a considerable de jure power in the king, but which was increasingly followed the councillors' advice.
|
|
I do not understand the principle on which the Chinese Government issued Yiu Hon a Home Visit Permit. However, under the principle of one country, two systems, the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region will not be subject to the decision of the Chinese Government on the above question. The Court shall decide whether or not Yiu Hon is still a 'Chinese national' in accordance with the Chinese Nationality Law and related provisions. The fact that Yiu Hon holds a Home Visit Permit has no direct bearing or significance on the matter in question.
|
|
The Tribunals of Inquiry (Evidence) Act 1921 was an Act of Parliament in the United Kingdom, now repealed, which set out the powers and functions of certain Tribunals of Inquiry along with the procedures for the taking of evidence. The Act did not give blanket powers for a tribunal of inquiry to be set up ad hoc. For a tribunal to be established under the Act, the matter in question would need to be one of urgent public significance; and would need to be authorised by the Secretary of State. If these prerequisites were met, such an inquiry would be established with judicial powers – in the same way as the High Court or the Court of Session in Scotland.
|
|
Formerly the administration was a cumbrous one, impeded by traditional obstacles; it may perhaps be said to have regarded itself as the primary object and the public which it should serve as of subordinate consideration. This state of things is now past, thanks to the energy of the reigning pope, which overcame all obstacles. Now, anyone who has business with the vicariate knows exactly to which department, which official, he must go in order to have the matter in question speedily settled. It is to be expected that in the course of time the third department owing to the test of practical working may undergo slight changes, as it is not probable that all ordinances will prove capable of permanent execution.
|
|
Because the general public (in the United States) generally trusts scientists, when science stories are covered without alarm-raising cues from special interest organizations (religious groups, environmental organizations, political factions, etc.) they are often covered in a business related sense, in an economic-development frame or a social progress frame. The nature of these frames is to downplay or eliminate uncertainty, so when economic and scientific promise are focused on early in the issue cycle, as has happened with coverage of plant biotechnology and nanotechnology in the United States, the matter in question seems more definitive and certain. Sometimes, stockholders, owners, or advertising will pressure a media organization to promote the business aspects of a scientific issue, and therefore any uncertainty claims which may compromise the business interests are downplayed or eliminated.
|
|
In 1982, the Supreme Court of the United States granted the state's petition for a writ of certiorari, reversing the judgment of the Court of Appeals and returning to them the decision on the constitutionality of Evans's sentence. This finding was made with two of the justices (William J. Brennan and Thurgood Marshall) entering an opinion "concurring in part and dissenting in part," because they accepted the argument of the State of Alabama on the matter in question, but held that capital punishment itself was "cruel and unusual punishment", prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. In July of that year, Evans fired his lawyers and filed a motion to dismiss all further appeals. The Court of Appeals accepted his motion on October 19, 1982.
|
|
Evidential burden has been described as the obligation "to show, if called upon to do so, that there is sufficient evidence to raise an issue as to the existence or non-existence of a fact in issue, due regard being had to the standard of proof demanded of the party under such obligation". Lord Bingham said that evidential burden is not a burden of proof, but rather a burden of raising an issue as to the matter in question fit for consideration by the tribunal of fact. In the criminal law context, if an issue is properly raised, it is for the prosecutor to prove, beyond reasonable doubt, that that issue does not avail the defendant." In the United States, however, both the burden of production and the burden of persuasion are referred to as "burdens of proof.
|
|
While participants may digress in their responses and while the interviewer may lose interest in what they are saying at one point or another it is critical that they be tactful in their efforts to keep the participant on track and to return to the subject matter in question. Make the participant feel comfortable: Interviewing proposes an unusual dynamic in that it often requires the participant to divulge personal or emotional information in the presence of a complete stranger. Thus, many interviewers find it helpful to ask the participant to address them as if they were “someone else,” such as a close friend or family member. This is often an effective method for tuning into the aforementioned “inner voice” of the participant and breaking down the more presentational barriers of the guarded “outer voice” which often prevails.
|
|
A statutory action under section 7 of the Trade-marks Act requires that the subject matter in question be a "trade-mark" as defined in section 2 of the Trade-marks Act.Dumont Vins & Spiritueuex Inc v Celliers du Monde Inc, [1992] 2 FC 634 (FCA). A "trade-mark" is defined in the Act as: > :(a) a mark that is used by a person for the purpose of distinguishing or so > as to distinguish wares or services manufactured, sold, leased, hired or > performed by him from those manufactured, sold, leased, hired or performed > by others, :(b) a certification mark, :(c) a distinguishing guise, or :(d) a > proposed trade-mark;Trade-marks Act, s 2. While trademarks can be protected whether they are registered or unregistered, subject matter that does not fall within the definition of "trade-mark" in the Act cannot be protected by the statute.
|
|