Sentences Generator
And
Your saved sentences

No sentences have been saved yet

30 Sentences With "judicial error"

How to use judicial error in a sentence? Find typical usage patterns (collocations)/phrases/context for "judicial error" and check conjugation/comparative form for "judicial error". Mastering all the usages of "judicial error" from sentence examples published by news publications.

Odebrecht's defense lawyer Nabor Bulhoes called the conviction "a grave judicial error" in a statement vowing to appeal the judgment.
The bill also refers to the finance ministry's obligation to recoup losses triggered by a judicial error from the judge who issued the sentence, instead of from state funds.
Another contested provision would empower the finance ministry to recoup any losses triggered by a judicial error from the judge who issued the sentence, instead of from state funds.
The result is that the 2020 election is expanding the 50-year-old culture war into new territory as Democrats — often under pressure from younger voters — seek to extend broader rights to those who have been previously stigmatized or marginalized, now moving beyond protection for minorities, women and gays, to provide more freedom to criminal defendants, the homeless, the mentally ill and unknown numbers of men and women imprisoned through prosecutorial misconduct, judicial error or other forms of systemic failure.
In April 2011, a poll found that nearly 60% of Ukrainians wanted the death penalty available for serial killings where judicial error had been ruled out.
The restructuring of governance occurred following legal problems involving Esteves. On July 12, 2018, Esteves was acquitted by the Federal Justice for lack of evidence, and his case is already considered a judicial error.
A fundamental error is a type of legal or judicial error. A judicial error is a mistake by a judge or court. If a majority of a reviewing court, such as an appellate court, finds an error or errors which impacts the result, the higher court may reverse the lower court's error in whole or in part (the entire judgment or a part of it), and remand (send it back) with instructions to the lower court. There are various types of errors which fall under two groups: harmless errors and plain errors.
Already considered one of the biggest judicial errors in Brazil, Esteves was acquitted of all charges. On June 28th, 2017, the Chief Justice of the Brazilian Supreme Court, Gilmar Mendes, referred André Esteves' case during the plenary session of the Supreme Court, "This is a fact of which we are witnesses. I must praise the loyalty that Minister Teori Zavascki also had with this case, when he verified this is a clear case of unequivocal judicial error, about which no one speaks because only success is spoken." Minister Sepúlveda Pertence was arguing and used the following expression: 'I am facing a scabrous case of judicial error'.
The appeal was filed with the Quebec Court of Appeal by Magnotta's defence counsel Luc Leclair, citing judicial error in jury instruction. The appeal further claimed that the "verdicts are unreasonable and unsupported by the evidence and the instructions." Magnotta withdrew his appeal on February 18, 2015.
Work, Darkest Before Dawn, pg. 220. Following a three-day trial, during which Dunne was blasted as a "Bolshevist and an agitator," Dunn was convicted and fined $5,000.Work, Darkest Before Dawn, pp. 221-222. This conviction was overturned by the Montana Supreme Court in May 1920, however, on the grounds of judicial error.
Eric Posner,'A Theory of Contract Law Under Conditions of Radical Judicial Error' (2000) 94 Northwestern University Law Review 749. Robert E. Scott,'The Case for Formalism in Relational Contract' (2000) 94 Northwestern University Law Review 847. and Richard Speidel.'The Characteristics and Challenges of Relational Contracts' (2000) 94 Northwestern University Law Review 823.
At one point Hegg sued Sutermeister for defamation. But he was not alone in disputing the verdict. Horace Mastronardi called it "the greatest judicial error of the post-war years".Roger d'Ivernois, "Après la démission de deux juges à la Cour de cassation: Les défenseurs de Pierre Jaccoud cherchent un Zola moderne" Journal de Genève 1 June 1976, p.
On October 26, 1987, the Alabama Supreme Court ruled she was entitled to her half-share in the Williams estate, as she had been the victim of fraud and judicial error. Hank Williams Jr. appealed the case in federal court, but the ruling stood when the United States Supreme Court refused to hear the case in 1990.
However, the basis on which the lower court reached its verdict may be brought into consideration and edited. In criminal trials by jury in the first instance, the defence may appeal on grounds of judicial error regarding the judges' direction to the jury (the summing-up of the theoretical foundations, which should be taken into consideration when the jurors deliberate).
3d 72, 88 [270 Cal.Rptr. 817, 793 P.2d 23] \- A court refusing a Marsden Motion prior to a 1368 hearing is a judicial error according to People v. Solorzano, however, a subsequent appeal court decision in People v. Govea did not consider such error to be prejudicial, and did not reverse a conviction, finding that "there was no prejudicial Marsden error".
Of the sixty men originally arrested, fifteen were sentenced to execution by firing squad, others to hard labour and exile. Reviewing the decision the highest military court, the General-Auditariat, ruled that a judicial error had been made and that all the remaining prisoners should be executed. However, when submitting the sentence to the Tsar they included a plea for mercy and a list of lesser sentences.
Unlike criminal cases in the lower courts, the Supreme Court does not deal with the issue of guilt. However, the basis on which the lower court reached its verdict may be brought into consideration and edited. In criminal trials by jury in the first instance, the defence may appeal on grounds of judicial error regarding the judges' direction to the jury (the summing-up of the theoretical foundations, which should be taken into consideration when the jurors deliberate).
He unsuccessfully appealed to the Supreme Court. Píka and his lawyer asked President Klement Gottwald (leader of the communist government) for clemency but this effort was unsuccessful. Heliodor Píka was hanged in the yard of Bory Prison () in Plzeň around 06:00 on the morning of 21 June 1949. In a farewell letter to his family, written the night before his execution, he wrote: "I am sure that this is not a judicial error but a political murder".
Following the reduction of her sentence, Saubin continued to receive public support and enjoyed special privileges as a "celebrity prisoner". She was given her own jail cell with a mattress, a supply of cigarettes and reading material, a cassette tape recorder, and music tapes. She also received visitors, including a French Catholic priest, a French nun, and French writer Didier Decoin, whose 1984 book Béatrice en enfer (Béatrice in Hell) blamed Saubin's conviction on judicial error. Saubin spent her years in prison building herself intellectually and emotionally.
Gërmenji was awarded with the Croix de guerre because he participated in the French capture of Pogradec with the battalion from Korçë. At the end of 1917 however Gërmenji was accused of collaboration with the Central Powers and summarily executed on 7 November in Thessaloniki after being sentenced to death by a French military court. It later became clear that the military tribunal had made a grave judicial error, its members having been led astray by Greek informers who wished Germenji removed since he was a powerful Albanian leader.
At the end of the 1990s, Jannuzzi was investigated for some articles in which he expressed numerous criticisms of the Neapolitan magistracy concerning the case of Enzo Tortora, considered as a victim of a very serious judicial error. In 2002, Jannuzzi was sentenced to two years, five months and ten days of imprisonment for press defamation, and in 2004 he was forced to serve his sentence, transformed into a home detention sentence. One year later, in 2005, President Carlo Azeglio Ciampi signed a provision of grace for Jannuzzi.
He was sentenced to an 18-year sentence. During his imprisonment he allegedly confessed the murder on student Anneke van der Stap in 2005 in Rijswijk to a fellow convict. Dutch philosopher of science Ton Derksen seriously questions the validity of the evidence in both cases and pleads for a retrial of both cases in his book Dubbel gedwaald (Double error), published in December 2017. The judicial error in the conviction of the first two suspects already aroused a discussion as how the police had done their research.
Pope Francis has stated that he is against the death penalty. In 2013, Pope Francis advocated that "capital sentences be commuted to a lesser punishment that allows for time and incentives for the reform of the offender". In 2015, Pope Francis addressed the International Commission against the Death Penalty, stating that: "Today the death penalty is inadmissible, no matter how serious the crime committed." Francis argued that the death penalty is no longer justifiable by society's need to defend itself, and the death penalty has lost all legitimacy due to the possibility of judicial error.
Jeremy Pickney, Marvin Stringer and Samuel Conway, all in their early twenties, were quickly identified as suspects due to their possessing stolen goods from the Gentry trailer. Stringer was killed during a shootout in a police raid when authorities attempted to arrest him at the Red Roof Inn on East Grand Ave. Conway was convicted at trial in June 2011 on multiple counts of capital murder and burglary, and sentenced to life in prison without parole. The Arkansas Supreme Court ordered a retrial of his case due to judicial error.
In an unbelieving world, Camus argues, the convicted is given no chance of atonement. The process takes place completely separate from the convict and simply dismisses him as beyond salvation or remedy. Camus also stated that in an unbelieving world there is no absolute authority capable of delivering judgement as no man possesses absolute innocence himself. Because of this Camus suggested that the maximum penalty should be being set at labor for life due to the possibility of judicial error, a life of labor in Camus's opinion being harsher than death but at least carrying the possibility of being reversed.
The affair caused public indignation and questions about the general workings of justice in France. The role of an inexperienced magistrate, Fabrice Burgaud,"Paedophile case that could bring down the Napoleonic system", Adam Sage, The Times, 2006-04-04 fresh out of the Ecole Nationale de la Magistrature was underscored, as well as the undue weight given to children's words and to psychiatric expertise, both of which were revealed to have been wrong. The media's relation of the events was also questioned; although they were quick to point out the judicial error, they also had previously endorsed the "Outreau affair".
The pardon power was controversial from the outset; many Anti-Federalists remembered examples of royal abuses of the pardon power in Europe, and warned that the same would happen in the new republic. Critics argue that pardons have been used more often for the sake of political expediency than to correct judicial error. In the 18th century, George Washington granted the first high-profile federal pardon to leaders of the Whiskey Rebellion on his final day in office. In the 19th century, Andrew Johnson controversially issued sweeping pardons of thousands of former Confederate officials and military personnel after the American Civil War.
Moreover, it is applied to people > whose capacity to cause harm is not current, but has already been > neutralized, and who are deprived of their freedom. [...] For a > constitutional State the death penalty represents a failure, because it > obliges the State to kill in the name of justice [...] Justice is never > reached by killing a human being. [...] The death penalty loses all > legitimacy due to the defective selectivity of the criminal justice system > and in the face of the possibility of judicial error. Human justice is > imperfect, and the failure to recognize its fallibility can transform it > into a source of injustice.
In similar vein, Adevărul focused on cases of abuse within the Romanian Army, documenting cases where soldiers were being illegally used as indentured servants, noting the unsanitary conditions which accounted for an unusually high rate of severe conjunctivitis, and condemning officers for regularly beating their subordinates. As part of the latter campaign, it focused on Crown Prince Ferdinand, who was tasked with instructing a battalion and is said to have slapped a soldier for not performing the proper moves. Adevărul investigated numerous other excesses of authority, and on several occasions formed special investigative commissions of reporters who followed suspicions of judicial error. It also spoke out in favor of Jewish emancipation, while theorizing a difference between the minority "exploiting Jews" and an assimilable Jewish majority.
In 2001, she worked in the film Malefemmene with Ángela Molina and directed by Fabio Conversi, in the role of Francesca, who was imprisoned following a judicial error and came into contact with the reality of friendship and attachment which she had never imagined possible. She also worked on Stai con me, with Adriano Giannini and directed by Livia Giampalmo, in the role of a mother of twins. In 2002, she worked on the set of Ilaria Alpi - Il più crudele dei giorni, in the role of the protagonist, directed by Ferdinando Vicentini Orgnani (the film tells the tragic and dark story of the Italian TV journalist killed in Mogadiscio). She also starred in France in the Holocaust-period TV drama Entrusted, directed by Giacomo Battiato, with Klaus Maria Brandauer, Thomas Brodie-Sangster and Steven Moyer, based on Loup Duran's best-seller.

No results under this filter, show 30 sentences.

Copyright © 2024 RandomSentenceGen.com All rights reserved.