How to use infringe the copyright of in a sentence? Find typical usage patterns (collocations)/phrases/context for "infringe the copyright of" and check conjugation/comparative form for "infringe the copyright of". Mastering all the usages of "infringe the copyright of" from sentence examples published by news publications.
"If someone continues to infringe the copyright of others, we will remove their account from Instagram," a spokesperson for Instagram said in an email.
|
|
In Positive Black Talk, Inc. v. Cash Money Records, Inc. (2004), the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit concluded that the song did not infringe the copyright of DJ Jubilee's song "Back That Ass Up".
|
|
They transformed an original work into a new mode of expression, but unlike a work of fair use expression, a derivative work's purpose was not transformed. In addition, when a derivative work transformed an original work into a new mode of expression such that little similarity remained, it would not infringe the copyright of the original work.
|
|
"This Song" was written after the week Harrison spent in a New York courtroom, unsuccessfully trying to convince a judge that his 1970 song "My Sweet Lord" did not infringe the copyright of the Chiffons' 1963 hit "He's So Fine". According to Harrison, the plaintiff's witnesses got ridiculously in-depth, breaking "My Sweet Lord" down into several melody lines, or "motifs", as they referred to them. The plaintiff's expert also drew up several charts with large musical notes on it to prove the point. Harrison said in his autobiography, I, Me, Mine, that after several days, he "started to believe that maybe they did own those notes".
|
|
In 2019, Decker testified as an expert witness in a lawsuit against Katy Perry, stating that Christian rapper Flame produced a "unique" eight-note "ostinato" - a repeating sequence of musical figures within a song - which Flame's legal team claims Perry plagiarized. Decker further testified that the ostinatos used in Perry's 2013 song "Dark Horse" and Flame's 2008 song "Joyful Noise" share “five or six points of similarity.” A blog post by copyright law expert Stephen Carlisle supported the verdict. A jury verdict that found the Katy Perry song did infringe the copyright of Flames's song was overturned on appeal on the 16th March 2020.
|
|
Pharrell Willams et al. v Bridgeport Music et al., No. 15-56880 (9th Cir. July 11, 2018) is a United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit case concerning Copyright Infringement of Sound Recording. In August 2013, Pharrell William, Robin Thicke and Clifford Joseph Harris (known by his stage name, “T.I.”) filed a complaint for declaratory relief against the members of Marvin Gaye's family and Bridgeport Music in the United States district court for the Central District of California; that the song Blurred Lines did not infringe the copyright of defendants in Got To Give It Up and Sexy Ways respectively. On 6 October 2017, Circuit Court held oral arguments on the appeal to vacate the district court’s Judgement. The Ninth Circuit upheld the District Court's decision against William and Thicke and affirmed liability of millions of dollar as damages.
|
|
No results under this filter, show 6 sentences.