Sentences Generator
And
Your saved sentences

No sentences have been saved yet

338 Sentences With "impeachments"

How to use impeachments in a sentence? Find typical usage patterns (collocations)/phrases/context for "impeachments" and check conjugation/comparative form for "impeachments". Mastering all the usages of "impeachments" from sentence examples published by news publications.

There have been three impeachments or near-impeachments in American history, none of which directly resulted in the president being removed.
Actually, partisan impeachments have been with us from the very start of our constitutional history, and presidential impeachments have always been overwhelmingly party-line.
Second, the Senate has the sole authority to try impeachments.
Then that's the way all impeachments operate in the future.
Impeachments (and certainly coups) generally send economies into a tailspin.
Here are the stories behind some of the wildest impeachments.
All we know is that with impeachments come political surprises.
Headlines of impeachments and economic woes have made many stocks cheap.
Compare this impeachment with the partisan makeup of prior impeachments. Sens.
"Enough with impeachments," the prosecutor said her father told her recently.
" The Senate, similarly, has "the sole power to try all impeachments.
Almost all impeachments in the U.S. have been of federal judges.
In this case, unlike in other impeachments, no crime was alleged.
The trial of impeachments, as understood by the Framers, included witnesses.
Impeachments were primarily designed to address misdeeds or abuse in office.
Such full House votes were held in the Clinton and Nixon impeachments.
So which party will gain an advantage from the House impeachments hearings?
The two prior impeachments show the perils of building slender and tall.
Of those impeachments, just six have occurred in the past 80 years.
"These types of impeachments must end," said White House counsel Pat Cipollone.
With so little to go by, drawing conclusions about impeachments is difficult.
Two previous presidential impeachments featured fresh witness testimony in the Senate trial.
Had the Senate convicted him, we would have invited endless contrived impeachments.
All prior impeachments of high office have always included abuse of power.
Impeachments are often threatened, but only seem to happen once a century.
In addition to reading the Federalist Papers, Romney has been reviewing prior presidential impeachments as well as impeachments involving federal judges, and is working with staff and legal counsel to go over the process for a Senate trial.
HAHN: ... standard for impeachment, we&aposre going to have a lot of impeachments.
I.O. and the state chamber of commerce called the impeachments an unwelcome precedent.
A Democratic aide said the new steps follow procedures used in previous impeachments.
You want there to be no impeachments allowed in an election year, ever?
And as different as the two impeachments are, there are some common elements.
The president has done nothing wrong and these types of impeachments must end.
But you asked and that is what I will remember about both impeachments.
Indeed, the majority of impeachments in the United States have contained noncriminal allegations.
Wall Street experts who have studied the history of modern impeachments and the market note that the data is limited by the two impeachments (Clinton and Nixon) that we have to work with, and it is difficult to draw firm conclusions.
The Democrats' impeachment inquiry has not adhered to procedures adopted in earlier presidential impeachments.
Other leaders have survived multiple impeachments in political struggles that have lasted for years.
One of the country's few impeachments, Andrew Johnson's, was precipitated by a veto override.
He had said, if this were a Democrat, the impeachments would already be starting.
Harman: I saw two impeachments up close and personal, and they are colossally disruptive.
It's another phenomenon of the minimal precedent and history that exists on presidential impeachments.
We've had two presidential impeachments in our history, neither of which ended in conviction.
We've had a bunch of impeachments when it comes to like the judiciary, like a bunch of judges over history have been removed from their seats, but we've only had a few presidential impeachments in history to draw from, three presidents total.
"There is a huge danger that the precedent set will stifle future impeachments," he said.
But it should follow the precedents that has been set in the last three impeachments.
" Under Article I, § 3, "The Senate shall have the sole power to try all impeachments.
The Clinton and Johnson impeachments are widely recognized as bogus — trivial acts of political vengeance.
Like past impeachments, the current trial's rules have prohibited senators from speaking during the proceedings.
Nixon pinned his hopes on the constitutional text authorizing the Senate to "try" all impeachments.
Under the Constitution, it is the Senate that has the sole power to try impeachments.
The U.S. Constitution has no need for a textual limitation on the frequency of impeachments.
Under the Constitution, it is the Senate that has the sole power to try impeachments.
I testified that both impeachments were narrow and propelled by deep hatred for each president.
But impeachments have hidden costs, which is a strong reason I have consistently opposed them.
Despite the span of time between the Nixon and Trump impeachments, two political rules remain unchanged.
Lawmakers meet to discuss impeachments "I would want to resign if that was me," Harbison said.
And the basic theory of the most important old English impeachments is built into our Constitution.
In Article II, Section 213: The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments.
And outside of presidents, there are several cases of judicial impeachments that began without a vote.
But this short list of impeachments includes some officials who were removed for non-criminal activity.
In Article II, Section 133: The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments.
On Washington Republicans want to filter out "nuisance" impeachments while Democrats want to demand more evidence.
But a supermajority in the Senate is still required to mitigate further against partisan House impeachments.
Impeachments differ from votes of "no confidence," which parliamentary systems use to remove a prime minister.
He submitted his first question Thursday night, asking the House managers about bipartisanship in prior impeachments.
He goes on to examine how today's news media environment compares to that during past impeachments.
Still, what conclusions, if any, can we draw from how the market reacted to previous impeachments?
It's worth noting: The impeachments of both Johnson and Clinton came when the opposing party controlled Congress.
The pro-Trump committee Republicans were strikingly ineffective in contrast to the two previous modern presidential impeachments.
Partisan impeachments by the House of Representatives are indeed allowed under the strict letter of the Constitution.
The Trump impeachment, on the other hand, is quite hard to analogize to prior impeachments and trials.
Once we are untethered from constitutional language, there is no reason we cannot retroactively include posthumous impeachments.
There have been a few dozen or so impeachments over the years, mostly of corrupt federal judges.
He could follow the precedent of past presidential impeachments and hold a formal trial in the Senate.
It does specify that in presidential impeachments, the chief justice presides for the remainder of the trial.
Initiating impeachment proceedings The two most recent presidential impeachments began with a vote in the full House.
So far, the impeachment investigation has developed in mostly the same way as previous congressional investigations and impeachments.
"These types of impeachments must end," said Pat Cipollone, the White House counsel and Trump's top impeachment lawyer.
Colonial lawyers pursuing these cases dedicated themselves to the study of the impeachments against the three Stuart kings.
" He added that Schumer's proposal could "only incentivize an endless stream of dubious partisan impeachments in the future.
Constitutionally speaking, presidential impeachments were intended to act as a check on the presidency by the legislative branch.
Peter King they'd be the only two House members in U.S. history to vote against two presidential impeachments.
We look back on the history of impeachments and ask whether the process is working as first intended.
But because all of the past impeachments have been bipartisan, these Democrats think this is the right move.
Edmund Randolph proposed that a third exclusion from pardons join those for state crimes and impeachments: prosecutions for treason.
They abandoned the long standing consensus that presidential impeachments should be bipartisan and based on clear and egregious wrongdoing.
Neither of those impeachments involved a president who had ordered those very witnesses not to cooperate with the House.
Trump's hybrid team of lawyers from inside and outside his White House follows a pattern from past presidential impeachments.
He had just published "Grand Inquests," a history of the impeachments of President Andrew Johnson and Justice Samuel Chase.
Four Times journalist recalled covering the second of those three impeachments — that of Bill Clinton for lying under oath.
Clinton impeachments – the major differences Sharice Davids to vote for Trump impeachment articles: 'The facts are uncontested' MORE's emails.
Ms. Lofgren, Democrat of California, is the lone Judiciary Committee member to have participated in all three modern impeachments.
John Kennedy says his staff had created a detailed briefing book of past impeachments and precedents he's working through.
You'd call judges and lot of, many impeachments, but it was on today everybody said this is impeachment-lite.
"Article 18683, Section 3, Clauses 6 and 7: "The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments.
All three instances of past presidential impeachments were also started by a House controlled by the opposition party. Yes.
Both he and Hastings challenged the procedures for their impeachments in Court, but in the case of Nixon v.
Many will be parsing his interest in the partisan intensity of impeachments as a potential clue to how he'll vote.
They are not going to vote for the party whose message is impeachments and investigations, especially during an economic resurgence.
Even if the House has broad license in impeachment, it does not have license to redefine crimes to fit impeachments.
In early England, the House of Lords often refused to hold trials on impeachments, which often were raw political exercises.
The lesson of past impeachments might be that it takes disasters, not just scandals, to remove a president from office.
Clinton impeachments – the major differences Sharice Davids to vote for Trump impeachment articles: 'The facts are uncontested' MORE in 6900.
Impeachments can be based on noncriminal acts, but that does not mean the noncriminal acts in this case are impeachable.
Clinton impeachments – the major differences Sharice Davids to vote for Trump impeachment articles: 'The facts are uncontested' MORE's blame game.
Tom Carper of Delaware said, adding that recent briefings have "focused largely on looking back at earlier impeachments" in Congress.
No doubt, impeachments and the trials of impeachment were affected by political motivations, but the trials remained a judicial function.
John Kennedy says his staff had created a detailed briefing book of past impeachments and precedents he's working through. *Sen.
Clinton impeachments – the major differences Sharice Davids to vote for Trump impeachment articles: 'The facts are uncontested' MORE in 2016.
"If they view the lack of a crime as key, then I do think that will influence future impeachments," Griffin said.
CNN: You profile, in great detail, the impeachments of Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton and the near-impeachment of Richard Nixon.
But the bigger issue is that the impeachments of Presidents Clinton and Trump are a reflection of our nation&aposs division.
Impeachments of any kind are rare in American history — before Trump, just 19 federal officials were impeached, most of them judges.
Clinton impeachments – the major differences Sharice Davids to vote for Trump impeachment articles: 'The facts are uncontested' MORE won 85033 percent.
Clinton impeachments – the major differences Sharice Davids to vote for Trump impeachment articles: 'The facts are uncontested' MORE White House campaigns.
The words of the Constitution speak in terms of a trial ("try all impeachments") and conviction ("no person shall be convicted...").
What happened in earlier impeachments The few other examples of presidential impeachment in American history have also been highly partisan confrontations.
Clinton impeachments – the major differences Sharice Davids to vote for Trump impeachment articles: 'The facts are uncontested' MORE's name is mentioned.
So what do we make of the fact that different measures are telling us different stories about Clinton's and Trump's impeachments?
Strategas analyzed how the market reacts around impeachments and found that the anticipation of impeachment is worse than the actual event.
For the past 2 presidential impeachments, the Judiciary Committee held a public, televised markup of the impeachment articles for several days.
It's been one month since Nancy Pelosi announced a formal impeachment inquiry, and things are moving much faster than in prior impeachments.
Additionally, the poll revealed that less than 50% of college graduates surveyed know that presidential impeachments are tried before the U.S. Senate.
Some impeachments move surprisingly fast, raising questions about fairness, due process and the line between legitimate removal from power and a coup.
As with the impeachments of former presidents Bill Clinton and Richard Nixon, this one will be broadcast live across major news networks.
The Constitution grants the "sole power of impeachment" to the House and the "sole power to try all impeachments" to the Senate.
The fact is that past impeachments have always looked to the federal criminal code to judge the gravity of such criminal allegations.
Clinton impeachments – the major differences Sharice Davids to vote for Trump impeachment articles: 'The facts are uncontested' MORE in the presidential race.
Which of course, ignores his own role in making it a spectacle, and the differences between past impeachments and the current one.
Philbin argued that the House's rush-job would set a bad precedent for the Senate should have to deal with future impeachments.
The rooms are littered with empty soda cans, pie leftover from Thanksgiving and boxes pulled from shelves containing files from past impeachments.
In the impeachments of both Presidents Nixon and Clinton, the House conducted an impeachment inquiry before moving to pass articles of impeachment.
The Supreme Court explained that the Constitution gives the House "sole" power to impeach and the Senate "sole" power to try impeachments.
One of the most bizarre stories was that I testified differently on my views of impeachment in the Clinton and Trump impeachments.
"I think I'm the only member of the House or Senate who was involved in both the Nixon and Clinton impeachments," says Rep.
Moreover, the lesson of history is that impeachments can succeed in the political sense even when they do not remove the offending official.
Pelosi added that, in past impeachments, the Senate laid out the guidelines for a trial before the House delivered the articles of impeachment.
That practice would substantially reduce the burden of members in starting this process and make future impeachments all the more easy to commence.
Our three presidential impeachments proceeded against incumbents with at least 6900 months in office — long enough to entrench serious doubts about their fitness.
In the impeachments of Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, the House conducted an impeachment inquiry before moving to pass articles of impeachment.
As the Court explained, the Constitution gives the House the "sole" power to impeach and the Senate the "sole" power to try those impeachments.
Trump went on a long tangent about how the Richard Nixon, Bill Clinton, and even Andrew Johnson impeachments were "dark" times in American history.
Ted Kalo is the former General Counsel to the House Committee on the Judiciary and has worked on one presidential and two judicial impeachments.
A House impeachment inquiry cannot be compared to a criminal trial because the Senate, not the House, possesses the 'sole Power to try Impeachments.
In addition to the presidential impeachments, Congress has carried out 253 other trials for federal officials including judges, a cabinet member and a senator.
More representatives voted to impeach Trump than in either of the two previous impeachments, of Bill Clinton in 2213 and Andrew Johnson in 1868.
On Monday he stood before the Senate and warned about a "grave disruption of government," and pleaded that all future impeachments must be bipartisan.
All day, he had been seen at his desk in the chamber reading a book, off and on, about the history of presidential impeachments.
Indeed, the acts of obstruction alleged against Presidents Nixon and Clinton in their respective impeachments were all such "bad acts" involving the impairment of evidence.
Barring any impeachments or him abandoning the position to go host some new season of Celebrity Apprentice, he will occupy the White House until 2020.
What can we learn from the impeachment inquiries launched against Andrew Johnson, Bill Clinton, and Richard Nixon — or the more numerous impeachments of federal judges?
McConnell was teeing up a rebuttal to satisfy Alexander's inquiry and push back on the claim that prior impeachments were equally decided along partisan lines.
Mr. Garber, a white-collar criminal defense lawyer who once edited his high school newspaper, more or less fell into impeachments as a legal niche.
They've got some thoughts on how the current President's predicament matches up with those past impeachments that inspired them to head to the recording studio.
"The very things that make the Senate the right forum to settle impeachments would disqualify all of us from any ordinary trial," he said recently.
And the founders emphasized that impeachments were about what happened in the political arena: involving &apospolitical crimes and misdemeanors&apos and resulting in &apospolitical punishments.
A public process, with televised hearings, published transcripts of depositions that appear to damage Trump and the mechanism familiar from past impeachments could expose the President.
The combination of the scholarly learning and of the handful of impeachments that we've had, suggest that the behavior doesn't actually have to be a crime.
The history of presidential impeachments shows that they are started by the opposition party but are never successful unless the president's party buys into the effort.
"I'm not sure of anybody who's defended more impeachments than I have, and even I think Dershowitz is wrong on this," Garber said Monday on CNN.
Strategas analyzed how the market reacts around impeachments and found in its report last year that the anticipation of impeachment is worse than the actual event.
Representative Zoe Lofgren, a Democrat who represents a Silicon Valley district, is the only House Judiciary Committee member to have participated in all three modern impeachments.
Impeachments come at times of tumult, when pent-up pressures seem to explode into conflict, when the fabric of society feels tenuous and the future uncertain.
"In both Nixon and Clinton [impeachments] the House formally endorsed impeachment inquiries and granted subpoena authority to committees for purposes of conducting those inquiries," he said.
Clinton impeachments – the major differences Sharice Davids to vote for Trump impeachment articles: 'The facts are uncontested' MORE if the number of war casualties were lower.
But it will be shaped by the impeachments that came before him, by politicians and lawyers and scholars and activists and media moguls who never imagined him.
The Point: Short of a clear and present crime, elections -- not impeachments -- are the way to decide whether the chief executive deserves to remain in that job.
Although they were very different episodes, both the Clinton and Johnson impeachments shared a mix of partisan and personal politics and real substantive questions about presidential politics.
Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), another member of the GOP leadership, said calling new witnesses would set an "incredibly dangerous precedent" of frequent impeachments litigated by the Senate.
Though the Constitution gives the Senate the "sole power" to try impeachments, it is silent on how quickly the House must transmit impeachment articles that it adopts.
The Constitution imposes upon the Senate a duty to "try all impeachments," and so a real trial — with all relevant testimony and evidence — is what is required.
In a significant departure from previous impeachments, Mr. Trump's lawyer signaled in a letter on Friday that the president would not take part in the House proceedings.
Calls to impeach Kavanaugh have received a lackluster response from Democratic congressional leadership, most of whom maintain that Democrats should focus on issues and legislation, not impeachments.
Zoe Lofgren, the only lawmaker to have worked on all three modern impeachments, said Trump's transgressions were worse than those that led to President Richard Nixon's resignation.
Turley argued that impeaching Trump solely for an "abuse of power" would break from the House's previous two impeachments that also alleged criminal conduct by the president.
That does not mean it is not impeachable, but the House will have to build its case to that level, not lower historical impeachments to "this" level.
The Tennessee Republican was spotted on the floor Thursday night absorbed in a historical account of the last three presidential impeachments — "Impeachment: An American History," his office confirmed.
"Donald Trump's lies differ from those we have encountered from other national figures, even Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton during their respective impeachments," wrote the Atlantic's James Fallows.
"It's very hard to say of 45 presidents in 240 years [that] never, or once if you count Nixon, is the right number of impeachments historically," Healy continues.
High tension, raw emotion and occasional violence have always been a feature of American democracy — in times of war and peace, through presidential impeachments and mass protest movements.
The only power granted to the Senate in Article I of the Constitution is the sole power to try impeachments, as it is doing now against this President.
The Constitution endows the Senate with the "sole" power to try impeachments, and Senate rules say a majority of senators can overrule the presiding officer on evidentiary rulings.
"I will present the history of the constitutional impeachment provisions, the history of impeachments that have gone on … and make a broad argument," Dershowitz told MSNBC's Ari Melber.
Some of these retroactive impeachments might appeal to the 57 percent of Americans who do not support the current impeachment, including the 45 percent expressly opposed to it.
"If the Senate volunteers ourselves to do House Democrats' homework for them, we will only incentivize an endless stream of dubious partisan impeachments in the future," he scoffed.
But whether Democrats would hold another House vote in the coming days to authorize their inquiry — as has been done in past presidential impeachments — remains to be seen.
Past impeachments have shown that senators can indeed transcend petty political instincts when their names are called, not just by the clerk but by history, and rightly so.
The term is generally used to explain how an authoritarian regime transitions to democracy, but it also offers a useful explanation of how impeachments work within democratic systems.
In Article I of the Constitution, it says the House shall have the sole power of impeachment and the Senate shall have the sole power to try impeachments.
Republicans charged that Democrats had abandoned the precedents of past presidential impeachments by limiting who could take part in the proceedings, and that they were trampling on due process.
If we are taught the impeachments of Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton in our history classes, we have every reason to be taught the current impeachment of Donald Trump.
Impeaching a president is a thoroughly partisan endeavor, as the only two impeachments that have gone to trial in the Senate, those of Bill Clinton and Andrew Johnson, demonstrated.
The Constitution provides that the "Senate [has] the sole power to try all impeachments," and absent a fundamental denial of due process, the rules chosen are beyond judicial review.
Compared with the previous two impeachments in US history, Trump had more votes against him than either of his predecessors: Bill Clinton in 1998 and Andrew Johnson in 1868.
Clinton impeachments – the major differences Sharice Davids to vote for Trump impeachment articles: 'The facts are uncontested' MORE in the polls by 1 point in the 85033 presidential election.
A small army of staff lawyers has spent weeks exhaustively researching House rules and precedents from the Clinton and Nixon impeachments to help Mr. Nadler navigate the coming hearings.
They're asking aides to prepare briefing documents and compile articles to use as reference material and they're turning to colleagues who served in Congress during past impeachments for guidance.
Republicans can apply pressure by recommending their own set of witnesses and subpoenas to offer, but Democrats -- as in past impeachments -- have veto power and can drive the timetable.
Indeed, English impeachments by the House of Commons often were not taken up for trial in the House of Lords, yet all those individuals still were referenced as impeached.
It published a 13-page report that presents its case for impeaching the president, a document that echoes those produced for the impeachments of Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton.
House Democrats say nothing in the Constitution or House Rules requires such a resolution, and note that impeachments of other federal officials, like judges, have not started with a resolution.
Contributing Opinion Writer NASHVILLE — After what seemed like 100 years of impeachments hearings, anything uttered on Capitol Hill now sounds to my ear like the voice of Charlie Brown's teacher.
And unlike the impeachments of Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton, this was not about something obscure like violating the "tenure of office act" or lying under oath about an affair.
Judge Nixon had made the case that, because the constitutional text authorizes the Senate to try all impeachments, his conviction could result only from a trial resembling a judicial proceeding.
And it sets a dangerous precedent for future impeachments by a majority of the House of Representatives that any abuse of power will do, irrespective of the rule of law.
Clinton impeachments – the major differences Sharice Davids to vote for Trump impeachment articles: 'The facts are uncontested' MORE and would not go to "polo matches and parties" in the Hamptons.
" Hamilton, the greatest defender of executive power among the Founders, highlighted the fact that "the powers relating to impeachments" were "an essential check" necessary to block "encroachments of the executive.
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy has slammed Pelosi for rejecting calls for a full House vote to authorize the impeachment inquiry, which took place during the Nixon and Clinton impeachments.
The battle also marked the first that occurred while the chambers of Congress weren't controlled by the same party, setting up the most sectarian and acrimonious of the three presidential impeachments.
The Constitution broadly grants the Senate the "sole power to try all impeachments," and, the argument goes, McConnell could simply construe that broad power to include the power not to proceed.
Let's stop engaging in magical thinking about resignations and impeachments, and use our constitutionally granted right to back the right candidates and throw the rascals out at the next two elections.
Yes, Trump's was a "partisan impeachment," but, judged by the percentage of aisle-crossers, the vote was only slightly more party-line than the two prior presidential impeachments, Johnson's and Clinton's.
The Constitution gives the Senate "the sole Power to try all Impeachments" and tasks the Supreme Court chief justice with the role of presiding officer when the president is on trial.
WASHINGTON — Representative Doug Collins of Georgia, trying to minimize the impeachment investigation of President Trump on Monday, pointed to the lack of memorable lines uttered by participants compared with impeachments past.
Instead, a person can be removed from office only if two-thirds of the members of the Senate, which "shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments," vote to convict.
But the constitution carves a path around the maelstrom, Hamilton insisted: the United States Senate will have the "sole power to try all impeachments" sent its way by the House of Representatives.
A trial-level judge held Friday that the Justice Department must release the details to the House, citing several historical impeachments of presidents and even the Federalist Papers' views on impeachment proceedings.
I spoke to his friends and advisers; to lawmakers and attorneys who have conducted impeachments; to physicians and historians; and to current members of the Senate, the House, and the intelligence services.
Schumer said at a press conference that while the Tennessee Republican came to the "wrong conclusion" about hearing more evidence, the Alexander's statement acknowledged that the House impeachments managers' allegations were correct.
Our top legal reporter looked at the kinds of acts the framers thought could justify removal from office, and how they played out in the impeachments of Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton.
Failed measures to impeach American presidents:While presidential impeachments are rare in the United States, it is not unusual for members of Congress to introduce resolutions seeking to oust the commander in chief.
It would be smart and right because, as matters now stand, the entire process smacks of partisanship, with little concern for the precedential impact which these articles could have on future impeachments.
The standing rules of the House explicitly outline the panel's jurisdiction, including the impeachment of judges, but they do not mention presidential impeachments, proving that the two are different, Republicans aides say.
Clinton impeachments – the major differences Sharice Davids to vote for Trump impeachment articles: 'The facts are uncontested' MORE supporter, I was astonished at the palpable adoration in reporting about Sanders (I-Vt.).
Lofgren has proved an invaluable resource to her fellow Democrats, who view her first-hand perspective to the Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton impeachments as a major asset going into the Senate trial.
There is an argument that the Senate -- holding the "sole power to try all impeachments" -- does not need approval or permission from the House, or any other entity, to start an impeachment trial.
Yet he's also been careful not to commit to anything as it relates to the trial regarding what he'd like to see, as he continues to study past impeachments and the case itself.
Clinton impeachments – the major differences Sharice Davids to vote for Trump impeachment articles: 'The facts are uncontested' MORE won 20 electoral votes in New Hampshire, Minnesota and Nevada by a combined 74,85033 votes.
Clinton impeachments – the major differences Sharice Davids to vote for Trump impeachment articles: 'The facts are uncontested' MORE and primary voters in New Hampshire have a record of rewarding candidates from neighboring states.
But more attention to Trump's behavior in Ukraine may also provide a stronger opportunity for the next Democratic nominee to reprise the core strategy of the winning candidates after the past two impeachments.
The House of Representatives has impeached only 15 federal judges since 1803, and eight of those impeachments were followed by convictions in the Senate, according to New York University's Brennan Center for Justice.
Clinton impeachments – the major differences Sharice Davids to vote for Trump impeachment articles: 'The facts are uncontested' MORE in the 2016 presidential election; and second, to investigate Vice President Biden and his son.
Clinton impeachments – the major differences Sharice Davids to vote for Trump impeachment articles: 'The facts are uncontested' MORE won the presidency in 2628, Karlan would certainly have been nominated to the federal bench.
The clear allocation to the Senate of the power to try presidential impeachments would be basically pointless if, as in the days of the Framers, another election were always potentially out in the offing.
The president's allies have harangued Democrats for impeaching Trump without accusing him of a crime, arguing that the two articles of impeachment are legally defective and set a dangerous precedent for future presidential impeachments.
Chief Justice Rehnquist used his opinion in the case to reflect on presidential impeachments, though he could not have known he would preside over the trial of the second one in the nation's history.
" Randall B. Woods, a history professor at the University of Arkansas, said that the Clinton and Trump impeachments were similar "in that they're both perceived as politically driven — but that's where the similarity ends.
That could come at a great cost for the country, which, despite periods of such intense and bitter division, has always treated presidential impeachments as a collective and weighty decision for the entire House.
However, by lowering the bar of what is an impeachable offense and by failing to meet the Pelosi/Nadler criteria, we will all but ensure that all future divided governments will lead to impeachments.
According to my colleagues, Democratic lawmakers and staff members are working out of cold, cramped spaces littered with empty soda cans, pie left over from Thanksgiving and boxes filled with files from past impeachments.
The Justice Department, in its written argument to keep secret the Mueller grand jury material, pointed to the impeachments of Presidents Bill Clinton and Andrew Johnson, and how those proceedings followed full House votes.
"No court has ever suggested that congressional committees can obtain grand jury material to conduct oversight or consider hypothetical future impeachments based on a lone Representative's referral," the Justice Department wrote in its filing.
Clinton impeachments – the major differences Sharice Davids to vote for Trump impeachment articles: 'The facts are uncontested' MORE in 85033 during the presidential election, accusations which have been roundly dismissed by the intelligence community.
Clinton impeachments – the major differences Sharice Davids to vote for Trump impeachment articles: 'The facts are uncontested' MORE sat down for a lengthy and wide-ranging interview with SiriusXM host Howard Stern on Thursday.
"In Article I, the Constitution gives the Senate the 'sole' power to 'try all impeachments,' and the Constitution requires that 'when sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation,' " Greenfield wrote.
While some constitutional experts insist that firing a special counsel is not a crime, and therefore not impeachable, such a narrow view is contrary to the statements of the Framers and the history of impeachments.
Collins mentioned an exchange he had with House Rules Committee Chairman Jim McGovern (D-Mass.) where Collins argued the Trump impeachment proceeding rules have not followed the precedent set by the Nixon and Clinton impeachments.
During an interview with MSNBC's Chris Matthews on his show, "Hardball," journalist and "NBC Nightly News" anchor Tom Brokaw compared the Nixon and Trump presidential impeachments, contrasting the political climates of the 28503s and today.
As my colleague Peter Baker pointed out before the holidays, impeachments historically come at times of profound national transition, periods in history when a divided country is questioning the very fundamentals of its political system.
While one impeachment is not legally binding on future impeachments, if the Trump standard is followed, it will become more difficult -- perhaps near impossible -- to impeach and remove an official based on abuse of power.
My objection is not that you cannot impeach Trump for abuse of power but that this record is comparably thin compared to past impeachments and contains conflicts, contradictions, and gaps including various witnesses not subpoenaed.
While Green's effort is viewed as unlikely to garner much support, we have had increasing calls for impeachment and, more ominously, arguments that impeachments may be properly based for any reason supported by enough members.
"In each of these impeachments, they are not taking place during periods of quietude," said Jay Winik, a prominent historian and author of "The Great Upheaval" and other books on pivot points in United States.
The Judiciary Committee report also seeks to rebut claims by Trump and his allies that Democrats have abused the impeachment process, setting out important new procedural markers for how the House should approach future impeachments.
In televised interviews, top administration officials and Senate Republicans have forcefully critiqued the integrity of the impeachment process by accusing Democrats of selectively leaking witness statements and ignoring the precedent set by previous presidential impeachments.
" The Senate resolution, sponsored by Mr. Graham and Mr. McConnell, accuses Democrats in the House of conducting an unfair, secret inquiry that "ignores the procedural rights given to the investigating committee's minority in previous presidential impeachments.
Mr. Garber, who teaches about political investigations and impeachments at Tulane University's law school and largely splits his time between Washington, Hartford and New Orleans, declined to detail any of his plans for the Missouri case.
He said there was precedent for conducting the investigation in private, noting in earlier impeachments, such as of Richard Nixon in the 1970s and Bill Clinton in the 1990s, investigators had done their work in private.
They gave the House "the sole power of impeachment;" the Senate "the sole power to try all impeachments;" and the chief justice of the Supreme Court the duty of presiding over impeachment trials in the Senate.
While rules of evidence do not bind committees, they have historically sought to follow basic rules of due process in impeachments and other proceedings tasked with finding facts underlying ultimate decisions of confirmation, removal or oversight.
Yes, there are procedures by which Gulati could be removed by U.S. Soccer's board of directors, but such impeachments are highly unlikely and generally designed for situations in which a board member has done something illegal.
The Framers' selection of the chief justice to preside over presidential impeachments achieved, Hamilton believed, "the prudent mean" of combining the highest-ranking judge in the federal judiciary with the upper house of the national legislature.
It's worth noting that in 22020, it was generally Republican candidates who were eager to bring up the topic of Trump's potential impeachments, thinking it would mobilize their base to turn out to protect the president.
The chief justice becoming more of a swing vote wouldn't change the overall rightward direction of the court, but it might be just enough to stave off widespread demands for dramatic changes like impeachments or court-packing.
" The "whole design of constitutional government would fall" and the people would have no "relief from oppression and wrong against those in exalted places if there was no independence or power in the assembly to make impeachments.
Clinton impeachments – the major differences Sharice Davids to vote for Trump impeachment articles: 'The facts are uncontested' MORE, and so initiated a full investigation with every intrusive investigative tool available to be used against the Trump campaign.
Monday's impeachment hearings got off to a sluggish start, with Sharman explaining to lawmakers the history of impeachments and answering procedural questions that included whether Bentley could be impeached for his failure to cooperate with the investigation alone.
To begin with, everyone concerned is a conservative Republican—further evidence, perhaps, of the risks of single-party rule, a danger amply documented in Alabama's lurid political history (the lack of impeachments is not for want of cause).
Second, if the Senate agrees to the Democratic demand for witnesses, it invites future rush impeachments where the House sends woefully incomplete and inadequate cases and demands witnesses it never bothered to subpoena, let alone compel to appear.
He also said that there were some common-law crimes at the time of the ratification of the Constitution, and that the framers expected Congress to eventually enact criminal laws that could serve as the basis for impeachments.
It now falls to the Senate to fulfill its Constitutional obligation to try impeachments, and it does not appear possible that a final judicial resolution of the still-unanswered Constitutional questions can be obtained before the Senate acts.
Professor Turley: If the House proceeds solely on the Ukrainian allegations, this impeachment would stand out among modern impeachments as the shortest proceeding, with the thinnest evidentiary record, and the narrowest grounds ever used to impeach a president.
Professor Turley: If the House proceeds solely on the Ukrainian allegations, this impeachment would stand out among modern impeachments as the shortest proceeding, with the thinnest evidentiary record, and the narrowest grounds ever used to impeach a president.
"If the House proceeds solely on the Ukrainian allegations, this impeachment would stand out among modern impeachments as the shortest proceeding, with the thinnest evidentiary record, and the narrowest grounds ever used to impeach a president," he said.
Now Ms. Lofgren is Representative Zoe Lofgren, Democrat of California, a close ally of Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a senior lawmaker on the judiciary panel and the panel's only member to have participated in all three modern presidential impeachments.
Clinton impeachments – the major differences Sharice Davids to vote for Trump impeachment articles: 'The facts are uncontested' MORE, who backed the deal as a member of the Obama administration but shifted her position as the Democratic presidential nominee.
The number of articles doesn't matter all that much — it only takes conviction on one to remove a president — but the Democrats' decision to go with just two puts this on the lower end of historical presidential impeachments.
"If the House proceeds solely on the Ukrainian allegations, this impeachment would stand out among modern impeachments as the shortest proceeding, with the thinnest evidentiary record, and the narrowest grounds ever used to impeach a president," Turley said.
Pelosi and her top deputies have worked to equip Democrats with additional talking points as they depart Washington, including a fact sheet that compares the ongoing probe to past impeachments to rebut GOP criticism of an unfair process.
Since last Friday, a lot has been said and written about the coup – how it came to this and what effect the failed coup will have beyond the hundreds dead, thousands injured and the countless arrests and impeachments.
The Senate is, therefore, caught in a tough position of enabling the House in such slipshod impeachments or refusing to hear witnesses who, unlike the witnesses called by the House, could have direct evidence to share on the allegations.
The report's authors state that this continuing debate is the reason for the report's existence; the impeachments of Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton used documents similar to this report to define when and why a president should be impeached.
The House took a formal vote in the last two impeachments of Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, but there is no law stating the House must hold a full vote to authorize an impeachment inquiry before they proceed with one.
"The rules that the House has put in place provide far more protection for the accused than criminal defendants have before grand juries, but they are in line with how previous Congresses dealt with the Nixon and Clinton impeachments," Seidman said.
Clinton impeachments – the major differences Sharice Davids to vote for Trump impeachment articles: 'The facts are uncontested' MORE, the 2016 Democratic nominee, who suggested in an interview that the Hawaii Democrat was the favorite candidate for the Russian government in 2020.
Senate Republicans have lambasted House Democrats for holding depositions behind closed doors and for declining to hold a vote that would formalize an impeachment inquiry, which happened in both the Clinton and Nixon impeachments but is not required by the constitution.
The Times looked back to the impeachments of Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, both of which he took part in as a senator, and found that he had consistently urged restraint and expressed discomfort with removing a president from office.
In the courtroom Neither Johnson nor Clinton faced voters for another term after their impeachments, and Chief Justices Chase and Rehnquist did not hear protracted court disputes in the vein of what Roberts already has on the docket related to Trump.
Though the Senate won't act to change its rules in the coming days, it's a response to speed up future potential impeachments and a similar rift occurring between a speaker and Senate majority leader, a source familiar with his plans said.
" It characterizes her decision to delay the articles as a "gross infringement on the constitutional authority of the Senate," while calling it "unprecedented for presidential impeachments" and a move that "is resulting in the denial of President Trump's day in court.
"House Democrats' novel theory of 'abuse of power' improperly supplants the standard of 'high Crimes and Misdemeanors' with a made-up theory that would permanently weaken the Presidency by effectively permitting impeachments based merely on policy disagreements," the filing reads.
"It now falls to the Senate to fulfill its constitutional obligation to try impeachments, and it does not appear possible that a final judicial resolution of the still-unanswered constitutional questions can be obtained before the Senate acts," Mr. Bolton wrote.
Clinton impeachments – the major differences Sharice Davids to vote for Trump impeachment articles: 'The facts are uncontested' MORE, who the president frequently criticizes in his tweets as "Crooked Hillary" and who released a book this year, placed seventh on the list.
Clinton impeachments – the major differences Sharice Davids to vote for Trump impeachment articles: 'The facts are uncontested' MORE and her unsuccessful 85033 presidential bid will premier at the Sundance Film Festival, with the former secretary of State expected to attend.
For Mr. Garber, whose bills are often paid with tax dollars because he is not representing a governor's personal interests, part of his job is ensuring that politics alone do not settle impeachments and undermine the authority of governors for generations to come.
Yesterday's vote on the rules and procedures guiding the impeachment investigation was a reminder of one big difference between this inquiry and previous impeachments: There is no independent counsel to gather documents and interview witnesses for Congress, so lawmakers are doing it themselves.
In its brief, the defense team said that the prosecution has broken with prior impeachments in not basing their violations on criminal law, since the House Judiciary committee voted to impeach Nixon on obstruction of justice and Clinton on that and perjury.
Zoe Lofgren, a veteran California Democrat who participated in the last three presidential impeachments, began to respond, Alexander quickly walked to the back of the chamber to confer with a top aide of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, his friend of 50 years.
Though McConnell won't move to change Senate rules in the coming days, it's a response intended to speed up future potential impeachments in case a similar rift occurs between a speaker and Senate majority leader, a source familiar with his plans said.
Yes. Article 1 of the Constitution explicitly grants the House the "sole power of impeachment" and the Senate "the sole power to try all impeachments," with no limitation on the time frame of the conduct that can form the basis for impeachment.
Democrats have defended their decision to hold closed-door depositions with impeachment witnesses and declined to hold a vote formally authorizing the impeachment probe — something Trump and the GOP have been demanding, arguing it happened in both the Clinton and Nixon impeachments.
"The judiciary, and the Supreme Court in particular, were not chosen to have any role in impeachments," Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist wrote for the court in a 1993 opinion that rejected an impeached judge's objection to the procedures used at his Senate trial.
McCarthy went on to allege that Pelosi opted to impeach without "one shred of evidence," accusing her of waiting to hold a vote formally authorizing and laying out the procedures for the probe despite a letter requesting she follow the process taken during past impeachments.
That he and John R. Bolton, the former national security adviser, were among the first people subpoenaed for testimony proved that, Mr. Mulvaney said, as Democrats should have known that those efforts would result in a court battle as was the case in previous impeachments.
In their open letter to the Senate, the group of legal heavyweights, which bills itself Lawyers Defending American Democracy, drew on language from the Constitution that gives the Senate "the sole Power to try all Impeachments" after the articles are transferred from the House.
Clinton impeachments – the major differences Sharice Davids to vote for Trump impeachment articles: 'The facts are uncontested' MORE, the worst showing there for a Republican presidential candidate in 20 years, and Democrats are eager to try to flip the state's electoral votes next year.
Moreover, given the seriousness of the conduct at issue—and its persistence—this matter cannot and must not be decided by the courts, which, apart from the presence of the Chief Justice here today are given no role in impeachments, in either the House or the Senate.
Clinton impeachments – the major differences Sharice Davids to vote for Trump impeachment articles: 'The facts are uncontested' MORE praised Greta Thunberg after Time magazine named the teen climate activist its "Person of the Year," tweeting that she could not think of a better choice for the award.
Clinton impeachments – the major differences Sharice Davids to vote for Trump impeachment articles: 'The facts are uncontested' MORE fell into the condescension trap in 2016 when she said, "Half of Donald Trump's supporters belong in a basket of deplorables" characterized by "racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic" views.
Clinton impeachments – the major differences Sharice Davids to vote for Trump impeachment articles: 'The facts are uncontested' MORE is famous for a lot of things and one of them is holding onto a grudge and the other is refusing to take responsibility for her own failings.
"If the House proceeds solely on the Ukrainian allegations, this impeachment would stand out among modern impeachments as the shortest proceeding, with the thinnest evidentiary record, and the narrowest grounds ever used to impeach a president," said Jonathan Turley, a law professor at George Washington University.
"  Regardless of how much congressional Democrats and media figures want to grasp at straws to prevent the Senate trial from being a complete embarrassment to their impeachment crusade, Republican leadership is going to follow Constitutional guidance, which gives the Senate the "sole Power to try all Impeachments.
While the Chief Justice presides over impeachment trials of the President, it is also true that the Supreme Court held in the impeachment trial of Judge Walter Nixon that the Senate's power to try impeachments included the non-reviewable final discretion to determine how to conduct its trials.
If there were to be impeachment proceedings, articles of impeachments under the "take care" clause and the "commander in chief" should be included in the case against Trump, whose budget cuts and failures to act in the national interest of the United States should not be overlooked or excused.
"Even though Republican senators have suggested that firing Mueller would be suicide and create a constitutional crisis for Trump, it is unclear if there are sufficient votes for impeachment, as the House has the sole power of impeaching and the Senate has the sole power to try impeachments," Rimm added.
It seems unlikely that America is at risk of regular or trivial impeachments even as it seems quite likely that the holders of an office as powerful as the American presidency might be well served to believe that impeachment is a real possibility if they perform their duties unacceptably poorly.
From the instant that Democrats assumed power in the House last January, denying that they had any intention of impeaching Mr. Trump, Mr. McConnell, a six-term Kentuckian and the longest-serving Senate Republican leader, directed his staff to quietly dig into the history of impeachments and consult with outside experts.
I should be worried," Trump said, before talking about the impeachments of former Presidents Bill ClintonWilliam (Bill) Jefferson ClintonSenate acquits Trump, ending impeachment saga Trump to make statement on impeachment 'victory' on Thursday Former Clinton speechwriter: Trump's address 'effective' method for rallying base MORE, Richard Nixon and Andrew Johnson as "dark periods.
The defense brief also says that the house managers need to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt, which is true in criminal cases but not in civil cases and not impeachments to my knowledge, and that the articles are written in such a way that the president has to be acquitted.
Collins said the impeachment of President TrumpDonald John TrumpThe Hill's Morning Report - Sponsored by AdvaMed - House panel expected to approve impeachment articles Thursday Democrats worried by Jeremy Corbyn's UK rise amid anti-Semitism Warren, Buttigieg duke it out in sprint to 2020 MORE differs from past impeachments because the facts are not agree to.
The two articles, which charge Trump with abusing power in his dealings with Ukraine and obstructing Congress in their investigation of those actions, passed almost exclusively along party lines, marking the most sectarian and contentious of the three presidential impeachments since the nation's founding — and the first to target a president in his first term.
One top Republican official said privately that the Senate should consider instituting a way to filter out "nuisance" impeachments rather than allow the Senate to be automatically plunged into a full-blown trial once charges are delivered by the House in a ceremony the official described as akin to a visit from the three Magi.
One of this week's trending political issues is pardons, impeachments, and President Donald TrumpDonald John TrumpTrump pushes back on recent polling data, says internal numbers are 'strongest we've had so far' Illinois state lawmaker apologizes for photos depicting mock assassination of Trump Scaramucci assembling team of former Cabinet members to speak out against Trump MORE.
In a 1993 case involving the impeachment of Walter Nixon, a federal trial court judge, for perjury and corruption, the Supreme Court held that because the Constitution vests the Senate with the "sole power" to try impeachments, it would not be appropriate for the federal courts to review at all the Senate's exercise of this authority.
"  Hamilton predicted with acute foresight that in impeachments these factions "will enlist all their animosities, partialities, influence and interest on one side or on the other; and in such cases there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.
Trump was given greater rights in the House than was Nixon to participate in the public examination of witnesses and otherwise present a defense before the Judiciary Committee (a right the president declined to use), and in all events the House has the sole power of impeachment, just as the Senate has the sole power to try impeachments.
" The university said "rather than focusing on President TrumpDonald John TrumpTrump pushes back on recent polling data, says internal numbers are 'strongest we've had so far' Illinois state lawmaker apologizes for photos depicting mock assassination of Trump Scaramucci assembling team of former Cabinet members to speak out against Trump MORE," the course "reviews all 19 impeachments in U.S. history.
"If the House proceeds solely on the Ukrainian allegations, this impeachment would stand out among modern impeachments as the shortest proceeding, with the thinnest evidentiary record, and the narrowest grounds ever used to impeach a president," Jonathan Turley, a professor of public interest law at George Washington University Law School, will say, according to his prepared testimony.
"If the House proceeds solely on the Ukrainian allegations, this impeachment would stand out among modern impeachments as the shortest proceeding, with the thinnest evidentiary record, and the narrowest grounds ever used to impeach a president," Jonathan Turley, a professor of public interest law at George Washington University Law School, will say, according to his prepared testimony.
After conducting at least ten impeachments between 1376 and 1450, Parliament didn't impeach anyone for more than a hundred and seventy years, partly because Parliament met only when the King summoned it, and, if Parliament was going to impeach his ministers, he'd show them by never summoning it, unless he really had to, as when he needed to levy taxes.
The impeachments of Bill ClintonWilliam (Bill) Jefferson ClintonMost voters say there is too much turnover in Trump administration RNC spokeswoman on 2020 GOP primary cancellations: 'This is not abnormal' Booker dismisses early surveys: 'If you're polling ahead right now, you should worry' MORE and Andrew Johnson were investigated in clearly defined phases, each the subject of a resolution passed by the entire House.
" But it's important to understand that Professor Turley was a strenuous advocate for the impeachment of former President Clinton while he now opposes the impeachment of President Trump, saying this: "I am concerned about lowering impeachment standards ... This impeachment would stand out among modern impeachments as the shortest proceeding, with the thinnest evidentiary record and the narrowest grounds ever used to impeach a president.
Clinton impeachments – the major differences Sharice Davids to vote for Trump impeachment articles: 'The facts are uncontested' MORE and then-White House press secretary Sarah HuckabeeSarah Elizabeth SandersBill Press: Mulvaney proves need for daily briefings White House correspondent April Ryan to moderate fundraising event for Buttigieg White House press secretary defends lack of daily briefings: Trump 'is the most accessible president in history' MORE Sanders, among others.
Earlier this month, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam SchiffAdam Bennett SchiffHouse panel advances resolution outlining impeachment inquiry Overnight Defense: Pentagon shares images of al-Baghdadi raid | Bolton called for impeachment inquiry deposition | Russia ambassador pick pressed on surveillance flight treaty House calls for Bolton deposition as part of impeachment inquiry MORE (D-Calif.) maintained that closed-door testimonies do not break with historic precedent, noting that special counsels in the Nixon and Clinton impeachments were investigated privately.
Clinton impeachments – the major differences Sharice Davids to vote for Trump impeachment articles: 'The facts are uncontested' MORE is waiting to enter the 85033 race and "save the Democratic Party" from former New York City Mayor Michael BloombergMichael Rubens BloombergThe Hill's Morning Report - Sponsored by AdvaMed - House panel expected to approve impeachment articles Thursday Krystal Ball warns about lagging youth support for Buttigieg Bloomberg unveils proposal to increase earned income tax credit, federal funding for housing programs MORE.
Clinton impeachments – the major differences Sharice Davids to vote for Trump impeachment articles: 'The facts are uncontested' MORE's recent suggestion that his decision to not endorse her sooner after the two battled for the Democratic nomination in 2016 ended up hurting her in the general election against Donald TrumpDonald John TrumpThe Hill's Morning Report - Sponsored by AdvaMed - House panel expected to approve impeachment articles Thursday Democrats worried by Jeremy Corbyn's UK rise amid anti-Semitism Warren, Buttigieg duke it out in sprint to 2020 MORE.
Clinton impeachments – the major differences Sharice Davids to vote for Trump impeachment articles: 'The facts are uncontested' MORE,' or 'Let's tap Bill ClintonWilliam (Bill) Jefferson ClintonParties clash as impeachment articles move closer to House vote USA Today editorial board calls for Trump's impeachment House's proposed impeachment articles are serious grounds to remove the president MORE or John KerryJohn Forbes KerryConservatives rip FBI over IG report: 'scathing indictment' Live coverage: DOJ inspector general testifies on Capitol Hill Mellman: Looking to Iowa MORE,' the people would have said what in the hell are you talking about?
Y.), chairman of the House Democratic Caucus; Val DemingsValdez (Val) Venita DemingsHouse delivers impeachment articles to Senate Overnight Defense: Foreign policy takes center stage at Democratic debate | House delivers impeachment articles to Senate | Dems vow to force new vote on Trump's border wall Pelosi: Trump's impeachment 'cannot be erased' MORE (D-Fla.), a member of both the Judiciary and Intelligence panels; and Zoe LofgrenZoe Ellen LofgrenHouse delivers impeachment articles to Senate Overnight Defense: Foreign policy takes center stage at Democratic debate | House delivers impeachment articles to Senate | Dems vow to force new vote on Trump's border wall Pelosi: Trump's impeachment 'cannot be erased' MORE (D-Calif.), a senior member of the Judiciary panel and the only member of Congress to have participated in both the Nixon and Clinton impeachments.   Reps.

No results under this filter, show 338 sentences.

Copyright © 2024 RandomSentenceGen.com All rights reserved.