How to use excusably in a sentence? Find typical usage patterns (collocations)/phrases/context for "excusably" and check conjugation/comparative form for "excusably". Mastering all the usages of "excusably" from sentence examples published by news publications.
Photo: Drew Angerer (Getty)It's a common misconception that words have meaning—specifically that "pedo guy," for all intents and purposes, would refer to a man (guy) who harbors or acts on sexual attraction towards children (pedophile.) In this simple confusion of terms, you would be excusably but insurmountably wrong, argues Elon Musk in a recent court filing.
|
|
Less excusably, Stewart also heard the gunfire and rode south to Aldudes, leaving the 2nd Division leaderless. In Stewart's absence, command of the division devolved upon Brigadier General Pringle, who had arrived in Spain two days before and was unfamiliar with the terrain. The main road across the Maya Pass ascends from the French side to reach the Spanish village of Urdax. From Urdax, the road rises to the pass before descending toward Elizondo.
|
|
The government had abandoned its principles and the Foxites were "more hostile in ten times in my opinion, and more decided to act upon principles contrary to my views, than the Ministry".Smith, p. 227. On 30 May Fitzwilliam met Burke at his home in Beaconsfield during his last illness before his death. Burke reported to Laurence that Fitzwilliam had "a strong predilection to Mr Fox" and "influenced, too much so in my opinion, though very naturally and very excusably, by a rooted animosity against Mr Pitt".
|
|
Atkin's interpretation has generally been > preferred in subsequent years. In Nakkuda Ali v Jayaratne[1951] AC 66 a > strong Privy Council held that Liversidge v. Anderson must not be taken to > lay down any general rule on the construction of the expression "has > reasonable cause to believe". Subsequently Liversidge v Anderson was > described by Lord Reid in Ridge v Baldwin[1964] AC 40, at 73 as a "very > peculiar decision". Lord Diplock in I.R.C. v Rossminster Ltd[1980] AC 952, > at 1011Refs: Tutt (1985) thought that "the time has come to acknowledge > openly that the majority of this House in Liversidge v Anderson were > expediently and, at that time, perhaps, excusably, wrong and the dissenting > speech of Lord Atkin was right".
|
|
A parliamentary question was asked by William Lunn MP in the House of Commons, with regard to doubts about William Conway's (and Edward Potter) conviction for the murder of Lieutenant Angliss. This being due to the two witnesses being of unreliable character. Mr. Lunn asked the Chief Secretary whether William Conway and Edward Potter were convicted of the murder of Lieutenant Angliss on the evidence of two witnesses; whether one of these witnesses was a servant in the house, whose account of the tragedy was excusably confused and contradictory; whether the other witness admitted that he was frequently drunk; whether he had been charged with disorderly conduct and also with assault and obscene language; and whether he had previously identified as having been concerned with the murder of Lieutenant Angliss two men who were subsequently proved to have been in gaol at the time? A second parliamentary question was asked by John Swan MP to the Chief Secretary of Ireland, Sir Hamar Greenwood, about the 15 witnesses at Conway's trial who were brought forward to prove William Conway's alibi that he was not present during the murder of Lieutenant Angliss on November 20th 1920.
|
|
No results under this filter, show 5 sentences.