In interviews since, he has drawn a distinction between Fox News, the network, and Fox News viewers.
|
|
He said he had drawn a distinction between Mr. Tharpe and his victim, both of whom were black.
|
|
"We have drawn a distinction between free speech and conduct that is aimed to intimidate others and promote violence," he said.
|
|
Ms. McDaniel has drawn a distinction between Mr. Wynn and Mr. Weinstein because, she said, Mr. Wynn denied the charges against him.
|
|
He could have criticized their actions, but drawn a distinction between the good and decent "counter-protesters" who didn't participate in Antifa's thuggery.
|
|
But Ms. Pelosi and Democrats have consistently drawn a distinction between the wall and border security, referring to employing technology enhancements and additional personnel as well as barriers.
|
|
Sessions has drawn a distinction between his role as a Trump surrogate and his duties as a senator and strongly denied ever discussing campaign-related issues with anyone from Russia.
|
|
He seems to have drawn a distinction between immigrants who are coming to the US to seek economic opportunity and those who are deserving of humanitarian protections such as asylum.
|
|
If he were, he might have drawn a distinction between a prima facie or "on its face" violation of the Laws of Robotics and a violation that ultimately requires a remedy.
|
|
Leadership at Microsoft and Google have drawn a distinction between providing benign cloud services to ethically questionable customers and aiding these firms with specific tech that could be used to cause harm.
|
|
Sessions: 'This allegation is false' Sessions has drawn a distinction between his role as a Trump surrogate and his duties as a senator and strongly denied ever discussing campaign-related issues with anyone from Russia.
|
|
Although some security experts saw the move as a constructive first step — China has not historically drawn a distinction between economic espionage and traditional intelligence gathering — many are skeptical Beijing is holding up its end of the bargain.
|
|
The lower courts have thus drawn a distinction between what happens if the administration gives a policy justification for its decision to wind down DACA, and what happens if the administration gives a legal justification for doing so.
|
|
Since the 19th century, Britons have drawn a distinction between the muscular warriors keen to expand their influence in far-flung lands and those citizens — the so-called Little Englanders — happier to retreat into an insular core of mercantile self-interest.
|
|
Industry sources have drawn a distinction between Boeing's tactical defense of the 10003 and longer-term discussions about a larger mid-market jet with about 21000-2350 seats, which could in turn prepare the ground for a full 2350 replacement after 2030.
|
|
Where the chief justice had drawn a distinction between policies that treat people differently based purely on their religious status (which are unconstitutional) and those which prohibit certain religious uses of state funds (which are sometimes, presumably, constitutional), Justice Gorsuch "harbour[s] doubts about the stability of such a line".
|
|
With one exception in the field of employer- employee relations, there is no recognized distinction in Canada between the rights and remedies afforded to trade secrets as opposed to mere confidential information. In the field of employer-employee relationships, the British case Faccenda Chicken Ltd. v. Fowler, which has been cited with approval by several Canadian courts, has drawn a distinction between the two.
|
|
Harvard College v. Canada (Commissioner of Patents) has drawn a distinction between lower and higher life forms (see below).Harvard College v. Canada (Commissioner of Patents), [2002] 4 S.C.R. 45. Where an invention is a combination of elements, the elements must produce something that is more than a mere sum of their individual effects. In other words, if each element functions independently and there is no common result, there is no inventive composition.
|
|
Several theorists have drawn a distinction between specific forms of reciprocity and "diffuse reciprocity" (Keohane 1986). While specific reciprocity is exemplified by international trade negotiations, as suggested above, diffuse reciprocity points to a wider institutionalisation of trust. Through consistent cooperation in an international society, states are seen as building generally accepted standards of behaviour. These general standards exert their own normative pressure on state action, contributing to the development of long-term obligations between states which stress cooperation.
|
|
As an academic discipline the study of politics in education has two main roots: The first root is based on theories from political science while the second root is footed in organizational theory. Political science attempts to explain how societies and social organizations use power to establish regulations and allocate resources. Organizational theory uses scientific theories of management to develop deeper understandings regarding the function of organizations. Researchers have drawn a distinction between two types of politics in schools.
|
|
A number of scholars have drawn a distinction between the letter given to John of Salisbury and the subsequent bull Laudabiliter. According to Arthur Ua Clerigh, the letter referred to was not Laudabiliter, but a formal letter of investiture, such as was used in the case of Robert Guiscard in Italy. Historian Paul Scheffer- Boichorst regards the donation as indisputable, while rejecting Laudabiliter as a forgery,Scheffer-Boichorst, Paul. Mittheilungen des Instituts für österreichische Geschichtsforschung IV, supplementary vol.
|
|
Section 2 of the Act forbade monopoly. In Section 2 cases, the court has, again on its own initiative, drawn a distinction between coercive and innocent monopoly. The act is not meant to punish businesses that come to dominate their market passively or on their own merit, only those that intentionally dominate the market through misconduct, which generally consists of conspiratorial conduct of the kind forbidden by Section 1 of the Sherman Act, or Section 3 of the Clayton Act.
|
|
The case is significant for the High Court having drawn a distinction between types of communication on abortion. As noted by Adrienne Stone, 'The court appears to accept the proposition that not all communication about abortion is political. This idea is very interesting and has a great deal of intuitive appeal. But the reason such a communication is not political is not made fully plain in the reasons and I think we will have to think about it in the future.
|
|
27, No. 4 (Summer, 2001), pp. 662-702; "Freedom, Cruelty and Truth: Rorty versus Orwell," in Richard Rorty and His Critics, edited by Robert Brandom, Blackwell, 2000 A recurring topic throughout Conant’s work is that of philosophical skepticism. In this connection, he has drawn a distinction between two varieties of skepticism, which he calls “Cartesian skepticism” and “Kantian skepticism” respectively."Varieties of Skepticism," in Wittgenstein and Skepticism, ed. by Denis McManus, (Routledge Press, 2004) Another major research area of Conant’s is the history of analytic philosophy.
|
|
The novel is set in the working-class neighborhoods near Alexanderplatz in 1920s Berlin. Although its narrative style is sometimes compared to that of James Joyce's, critics such as Walter Benjamin have drawn a distinction between Ulysses’ interior monologue and Berlin Alexanderplatz's use of montage. Oliver Kamm, writing in the London Times, says Döblin's methods are more akin to Kafka in his use of "erlebte Rede (roughly, experienced speech — a blending of first-person and third-person narrative)". The novel is told from multiple points of view, and uses sound effects, newspaper articles, songs, speeches, and other books to propel the plot forward.
|
|
Furthermore, it has been argued that since the President is elected to exercise the powers defined in the Constitution, the concept of "political legitimacy" posited by proponents would appear to be undermined by soft power, which has an unspecified and ambiguous scope. Secondly, the President serves the important symbolic function of representing the nation. The relationship between the Cabinet and the President may be compared with that between the Cabinet of the United Kingdom and the monarchy. Vernon Bogdanor has drawn a distinction between the "efficient" and "dignified" elements of the Constitution of the United Kingdom.
|
|
Quentin Smith claims that current proponents of the B-theory argue that the inability to translate tensed sentences into tenseless sentences does not prove the A-theory of time. Noted logician and philosopher Arthur Prior (originator of tense logic) has also drawn a distinction between what he calls A-facts and B-facts. The latter are facts about tenseless relations, such as the fact that the year 2025 is 25 years later than the year 2000. The former are tensed facts, such as the Jurassic age being in the past, or the end of the universe being in the future.
|
|
In a July 1996 Pulse magazine article entitled "You Want Alternative?", Chusid coined the term "outsider music",Campau, Don, The Living Archive of Underground Music, interview with Irwin Chusid, November 2, 2011 which he defines as "crackpot and visionary music, where all trails lead essentially one place: over the edge". Chusid has drawn a distinction between the terms "incorrect music" (as used on his WFMU radio program) and "outsider music", which he insists are not synonymous and overlap only slightly. Chusid has explained that Incorrect Music was a radio concept, which included all manner of musical "wrongness", often by people who should have known better, or whose sincerity was questionable.
|
|
In 1896, one of Wilhelm Wundt's former Leipzig laboratory assistants, Oswald Külpe (1862–1915), founded a new laboratory in Würzburg. Külpe soon surrounded himself with a number of younger psychologists, the so-called Würzburg School, most notably Narziß Ach (1871–1946), Karl Bühler (1879–1963), Ernst Dürr (1878–1913), Karl Marbe (1869–1953), and Henry Jackson Watt (1879–1925). Collectively, they developed a new approach to psychological experimentation that flew in the face of many of Wundt's restrictions. Wundt had drawn a distinction between the old philosophical style of self-observation (Selbstbeobachtung) in which one introspected for extended durations on higher thought processes, and inner perception (innere Wahrnehmung) in which one could be immediately aware of a momentary sensation, feeling, or image (Vorstellung).
|
|
Whether a particular condition amounts to a disease of the mind within the Rules is not a medical but a legal question to be decided in accordance with the ordinary rules of interpretation. It seems that any disease which produces a malfunctioning of the mind is a disease of the mind and need not be a disease of the brain itself. The term has been held to cover numerous conditions: The courts have clearly drawn a distinction between internal and external factors affecting a defendant's mental condition. This is partly based on risk of recurrence, whereby the High Court of Australia has expressed that the defence of automatism is unable considered when the mental disorder has been proved transient and as such not likely to recur.
|
|
For instance, in Latin America during the 1990s, populism was often associated with politicians like Peru's Alberto Fujimori who promoted neoliberal economics, while in the 2000s it was instead associated with those like Venezuela's Hugo Chávez who promoted socialist programmes. As well as populists of the left and right, populist figures like Italy's Beppe Grillo have been characterised as centrist and liberals, while groups like Turkey's Justice and Development Party have been described as combining populism with Islamism, and India's Bharatiya Janata Party has been seen as mixing populism with Hindu nationalism. Although populists of different ideological traditions can oppose each other, they can also form coalitions, as was seen in the Greek coalition government which brought together the left-wing populist Syriza and the right-wing populist Independent Greeks in 2015. Adherents of the ideational definition have also drawn a distinction between left and right- wing populists.
|
|
Executive Order 6102 In its sales literature, Goldline had drawn a distinction between what it caled "government gold" and "private gold." During the Great Depression, in order to stabilize the dollar then backed by gold and to avoid a run on the banks, U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt issued a 1933 executive order requiring citizens to surrender their gold for which they were reimbursed at a price set by the government itself. Goldline stated that "private gold" (defined as coins that were explicitly exempted from the 1933 order because of their collector value) would be less likely to be recalled in the future if the government followed the precedent set by Roosevelt, thereby possibly increasing the desirability of collector-grade coins. The Roosevelt order resulted in only one failed prosecution, and the dollar is no longer backed by gold thereby putting into question why the government would again ask for its surrender. Rep.
|
|
The effect of the SAAMCO case was to exclude from liability the damages attributable to a fall in the property market notwithstanding that those losses were foreseeable in the sense of being “not unlikely” (property values go down as well as up) and had been caused by the negligent valuation in the sense that, but for the valuation, the bank would not have lent at all and there was no evidence to show that it would have lost its money in some other way. It was excluded on the ground that it was outside the scope of the liability which the parties would reasonably have considered that the valuer was undertaking. Subsequent case law has drawn a distinction between cases merely providing information, and those providing advice. The principle in SAAMCO cannot be invoked in cases where investment advisers specifically direct an investor to make a specific investment (see Rubenstein v HSBC Bank plc[2012] EWCA Civ 1184 and Aneco Reinsurance Underwriting Ltd (in liquidation) v Johnson & Higgins Ltd[2001] UKHL 51), though it may be rather difficult to carefully demarcate where information ends and directed investment advice begins.
|
|
Other research has, however, concluded that there is value in distinguishing the components of social cohesion and "[t]ask cohesion ... the commitment to working together on a shared goal", since some studies conclude that unit effectiveness correlates strongly with task cohesion, not with social cohesion. This debate about the relative importance, or even need for, the concepts of social cohesion and task cohesion is exemplified by an exchange between Anthony King and Guy Siebold in the journal Armed Forces & Society in 2006–2007.Anthony King, "The Word of Command: Communication and Cohesion in the Military," Armed Forces and Society 32, 4 (2006): 493–512; Guy L. Siebold, "The Essence of Military Group Cohesion," Armed Forces and Society 33, 2 (2007), 286–295; Anthony King, "The Existence of Group Cohesion in the Armed Forces: A Response to Guy Siebold," Armed Forces and Society 33, 4 (2007): 638–645. One U.S. military researcher has drawn a distinction between teamwork and unit cohesion—claiming teamwork as being merely "collaboration", while unit cohesion involves a bond that can sustain mutual commitment, not just to the mission, but to each other, and to the group as a whole.
|
|