Sentences Generator
And
Your saved sentences

No sentences have been saved yet

24 Sentences With "control the content of"

How to use control the content of in a sentence? Find typical usage patterns (collocations)/phrases/context for "control the content of" and check conjugation/comparative form for "control the content of". Mastering all the usages of "control the content of" from sentence examples published by news publications.

As stated previously, we do not control the content of Barstool Sports.
The government is finding it harder to control the content of the internet.
The company said it would not change its postal secrecy principle to control the content of packages.
Mr. Abinanti emphasized that while the Public Service Commission would ensure companies' compliance with the local news requirement, it would not control the content of that news.
While the MERA did not control the content of sermons in non-Islamic communities, groups were prohibited from issuing any publications without obtaining the Ministry's prior approval. There were no reports of religious prisoners or detainees in the country.
The incident was reported to had occurred on December 1, 2010 when a tanker loaded with liters of gasoline lost control. The content of the tanker spewed on the road leading to an explosion that claimed the lives of about 20 people and leaving several others severely injured. Four vehicles, including 2 commuter buses filled with more than 24 commuters and 2 private cars, were burnt. Taiwo Abayomi, the Area Commander of the Lagos State Traffic Management Authority confirmed the incident.
The holder of the post does not act to censor, edit or otherwise control the content of the newspaper. The newspaper employs numerous students who fill positions in the news, arts and entertainment, opinions, sports, design, advertising, business, copy editing, photography, web and editorial departments of the newspaper. At the end of each academic year, a panel of senior staff members selects an Editor-in-Chief for the following year. This Editor-in-Chief then selects his or her own staff for the following year.
Users were originally able to create Shared Circles, a one-time share to promote a circle of individuals, but the feature has been removed. Another function of Circles was to control the content of one's Stream. If a user clicked on a Circle in the Circle Streams list, the Stream portion of the page (the center) would contain only posts shared by users in that Circle. For the unsegmented Stream (including content from all of a user's Circles), each Circle had a drop-down configuration item with four options: none, fewer, standard, and more.
Jaeger was dismissive of the controversy, and had no idea that the project would attract so much controversy. He used multiple examples of video games and other media that feature things considered inappropriate for children yet get a relative pass to argue a double standard. The Attorney General of Connecticut Richard Blumenthal sent a letter to the ESRB which criticized it for its Teen rating of Pong Toss. ESRB spokesperson Eliot Mizrachi argued that it was not their role to control the content of the game, merely to assess content.
The first Board members from 2006 were Carol E. Dinkins, of Texas, Chairwoman; Alan Charles Raul, of the District of Columbia, Vice Chairman; Theodore B. Olson, of Virginia; Lanny Davis, of Maryland, and Francis X. Taylor, of Maryland. The Chairwoman and Vice Chairman were confirmed by the Senate on February 17, 2006. All Board members were sworn in and had their first meeting on March 14, 2006. On May 14, 2007, Lanny Davis resigned, charging that the White House had sought to control the content of a Board report.
Assuming the calendar would sell well, the BSA, Brown & Bigelow, and Rockwell worked out a deal for future calendars. Rockwell would paint his paintings years in advance so that it could be the cover of Boys Life early in the year to advertise that year's calendar. Two early years of the calendar series – 1928 and 1930 – were missed due to Rockwell having too many other commissions. To prevent this from happening in the future and to control the content of the paintings, James E. West devised a yearly workflow.
Even after controlling the voice samples as well as the face samples (using blurred faces), studies have shown that semantic information can be more accessible to retrieve when individuals are recognizing faces than voices. Another technique to control the content of the speech extracts is to present the faces and voices of personally familiar individuals, like the participant's teachers or neighbors, instead of the faces and voices of celebrities. In this way alike words are used for the speech extracts. For example, the familiar targets are asked to read exactly the same scripted speech for their voice extracts.
Hartford Courant lays off consumer columnist, The New York Times, retrieved August 24, 2009 Gombossy's lawsuit against the Courant was thrown out by a Connecticut Superior Court judge in July 2010. In his decision, Judge Marshall K. Berger, Jr. remarked that newspaper owners and editors have a "paramount" right to "control [the] content of their papers," further observing that in his role at the Courant, Gombossy had "no constitutional right to publish anything."Judge Dismisses Former Columnist's Lawsuit Against The Courant, The Hartford Courant, retrieved July 6, 2010. However, Gombossy's attorneys filed a second complaint, and Judge Berger reinstated the complaint.
Nude scenes can be controversial in some cultures because they may challenge some of the community's standards of modesty. These standards vary by culture, and depend on the type of nudity, who is exposed, which parts of the body are exposed, the duration of the exposure, the pose, the context, and other aspects. Regardless, in many cultures nudity in film is subject to censorship or rating regimes which control the content of films. Many directors and producers apply self-censorship, limiting nudity (and other content) in their films, to avoid external censorship or a strict rating, in countries that have a rating system.
He said the following.424 US 1, 260-5 (1976) > Justice White (above) would have upheld the law's limits on expenditures and > contributions. Concededly, neither the limitations on contributions nor > those on expenditures directly or indirectly purport to control the content > of political speech by candidates or by their supporters or detractors. What > the Act regulates is giving and spending money, acts that have First > Amendment significance not because they are themselves communicative with > respect to the qualifications of the candidate, but because money may be > used to defray the expenses of speaking or otherwise communicating about the > merits or demerits of federal candidates for election.
As a known supporter of President Roosevelt, whom both McCormick and Hearst opposed based on his successful attempts to control the content of radio programs and his ongoing efforts to control print, Welles may have had incentive to use the film to smear both men. The character of political boss Jim W. Gettys is based on Charles F. Murphy, a leader in New York City's infamous Tammany Hall political machine. Welles credited "Rosebud" to Mankiewicz. Biographer Richard Meryman wrote that the symbol of Mankiewicz's own damaged childhood was a treasured bicycle, stolen while he visited the public library and not replaced by his family as punishment.
The controversy's origins can be traced at least to 2013, when South Korea's Ministry of Education instructed publishers to revise their history textbooks. In 2015 the South Korean National Institute of Korean History announced plans to replace existing history textbooks in high schools with one authorized version by March 2017. The state-issued textbooks are to be written by a government-appointed panel of experts. In the larger context, this controversy is a part of an ongoing dispute on whether the state should control the content of history textbooks, and possibly enforce a monopoly, or whether individual schools (or teachers) should be free to choose their own textbooks.
Some detractors of paid inclusion allege that it causes searches to return results based more on the economic standing of the interests of a web site, and less on the relevancy of that site to end-users. Often the line between pay per click advertising and paid inclusion is debatable. Some have lobbied for any paid listings to be labeled as an advertisement, while defenders insist they are not actually ads since the webmasters do not control the content of the listing, its ranking, or even whether it is shown to any users. Another advantage of paid inclusion is that it allows site owners to specify particular schedules for crawling pages.
In 1995, Cablevision was receiving complaints from the administration of Fairfield University regarding the content of some of the programs being produced at the Xavier Hall facilities. The administration believed that the adult language and themes featured on The Lone Shark and a few other programs might give the university a bad public image, because most of the programs stated (either in conversation or in their credits) that they were produced at Fairfield University. The university administration informed Cablevision that they no longer wanted to host the studio and broadcast facilities on their campus if Cablevision could not control the content of the programming. Federal regulations forbade Cablevision from censoring the content of the programs produced in their local-cable studios.
Vicarious copyright infringement is established if Defendants have both the right and ability to supervise the infringing conduct and a direct financial interest in the infringing activity. In this case, Perfect 10 alleged that the defendants had an indirect right and ability to control the content of the infringing websites by refusing to process credit card payments to the websites. The court ruled that the defendants could block access to their payment system, but they could not block access to the Internet, and therefore could not block access to the infringing websites nor to the search engines that enabled their discovery. In other words, since the defendants could not directly supervise infringing conduct, they did not have the right and ability to control content, and vicarious infringement could not be established.
There are several strong and sweeping pieces of legislation that have long been used by Malaysia to restrict the human rights of individuals and thus preserve, in its view, social order. In 2008 Amnesty International summed up the state of human rights in Malaysia, in part, by noting that the government had “tightened control of dissent and curtailed the right to freedom of expression and religion,” arresting bloggers under the Sedition Act, using the Printing Presses and Publications Act (PPPA) to control the content of newspapers, and arbitrarily arresting several individuals under the Internal Security Act (ISA). In 2012 there were major changes in a number of these laws that were officially described as human-rights reforms but that have been widely criticised either for not going far enough or for, in fact, further restricting human rights.
"Council Debates Cigarette Tax to Build Up City Reserve Fund," Los Angeles Times, January 27, 1940, page 1 1940–41 In October 1940, the councilman attempted to control the content of radio broadcasts over station KRKD from the City Hall when he submitted a motion "to make the talks strictly noncontroversial and if a speaker strays from that path, to shut him off the air.""Radio Talk Stirs Council," Los Angeles Times, October 12, 1940, page A-1 Six months later, in April 1941, the Council unanimously adopted his motion to set the council on record "as being opposed to any radio broadcast, publication or spoken word, which in any way may be interpreted as being subversive in character or lending itself to anti-American or undemocratic principles of government." Copies of the resolution were ordered sent to all Los Angeles radio stations and to the Federal Communications Commission.
A few months after Sean Haffner began working on The Lone Shark, host Jim Sharky realized that he and Haffner worked well together (even if they didn’t always have the same ideas as to the content and direction of the program). Sharky asked Haffner if he would like to be the producer of The Lone Shark (with Sharky controlling the program as Executive Producer) and Haffner accepted. From that time until the end of The Lone Shark’s production, Sharky would control the content of The Lone Shark, while Haffner controlled the technical aspects of the program. Sharky and Haffner were usually the only people in the studio during each episode of The Lone Shark (unless the episode featured an in-studio guest). The rest of The Lone Shark’s crew was usually working in the control room, keeping in contact with Haffner in the studio through a communication headset that was plugged into either Haffner's camera or a port in the studio's wall.
In 1993, production of The Lone Shark began having trouble with the WFAC-TV station management when a new station rule required that the tapes of all programs that were to be broadcast from the WFAC-TV facilities had to be submitted by station management for review two weeks prior to each programs' broadcast date. This rule was one of many enacted by station management during The Lone Shark's ten years on television to try to control the content of some shows which they believed were pushing the limits of what the station management considered to be "good taste". Jim Sharky and Sean Haffner saw this two-week gap as a major hindrance to The Lone Shark. Because a majority of the topics discussed on The Lone Shark had to do with that day's or that week's news, the topics would lose meaning or topicality if they were not viewed within a few days of the program's taping.

No results under this filter, show 24 sentences.

Copyright © 2024 RandomSentenceGen.com All rights reserved.