Several other lawyers agreed that the treaty obliged Australia to administer foreign sentences even when they may be repugnant to Australian values.
|
|
The idea that the American people may never see a detailed report of what Mueller finds ought to be repugnant to every citizen.
|
|
The director ended his message be saying that "glorifying an obviously guilty and sick individual whose aftermath has meant tragedy for so many would be repugnant to me."
|
|
"We find the view that a particular religion should be discriminated against to be repugnant to the values held at Morningside College," the college said in a statement.
|
|
"We have all kinds of people speak, whose views might in cases be repugnant to mine and to others of our attendees, but we want to foster a debate," he said.
|
|
The wonder of travel, for me, is to reckon with the kindness that can survive in the heart of a religious bigot, or the integrity of someone conforming to a moral system that they believe wholeheartedly but that may be repugnant to us.
|
|
As this did not involve a challenge to the constitutionality of legislation, each judge is free to hand down separate judgements. In a 3-2 decision a majority of the Court found Part III to be repugnant to the Constitution.
|
|
If he is immortal, he can have only God as his author. God must therefore be his judge, punishing him for his vices and rewarding him for his virtues. He concluded that liberty would be repugnant to all who chose to live independent of God.
|
|
When her husband is downhearted, she shares his troubles. In public, she hides her secret parts and does not let anyone see them. She always dresses well and avoids showing her husband what might be repugnant to him. At this point, the author tells the story of Dorerame, a slave who enjoyed making love with the most beautiful and well-born young women of his time, even if they belonged to other men.
|
|
The three generally felt that interpreting the "immoral" aspect of the Lanham Act was difficult, and thus agreed with the majority in striking that portion of the law. However all three felt the "scandalous" interpretation was not as vague as majority opinion suggested, and that the Office would not be engaging in viewpoint discrimination through this action. The three, along with Alito in his concurring opinion, did express concern that this decision will lead to a flood of new trademarks that would be considered crude, and the creation of public spaces that would be repugnant to some people.
|
|
Battle of Drumclog Memorial inscription In 1685, Brown was captured (along with his nephew, one 'John Brownen') by a troop of horse under the command of Graham of Claverhouse. Brown's house was searched where 'bullets, match and treasonable documents' were found.Mark Napier - Memorials and letters illustrative of life and times of John Graham of Claverhouse, viscount Dundee (1859) Brown was offered the chance to take the Oath of Abjuration. Brown refused to swear the oath which was designed to be repugnant to Covenanters and thereby a "sieve, the mesh of which would winnow the loyal from the disloyal".
|
|
On 11 May 2012, the Court of Criminal Appeal quashed the conviction of Ted Cunningham on all ten charges, citing an invalidity of the warrant used to search his house. The invalidity referred to the fact that the warrant was issued by the senior Garda in charge of the investigation, as allowed for by section 29 (1) of the Offences against the State Act, a state of affairs which the Court found to be repugnant to the Constitution of Ireland. The Court ordered a retrial on nine of the ten original counts of money laundering. It directed that the tenth, relating to a sum of money allegedly found in Cunningham's home was not to be retried.
|
|
In February 1685 the King died and was succeeded by his brother as King James VII. In response to these shows of political sedition, the Scottish Privy Council authorised extrajudicial field executions of those caught in arms or those who refused to swear loyalty to the King and renounce the Covenant by an Abjuration Oath. This Oath of Abjuration was specifically designed to be repugnant to Covenanters and thereby act as a "sieve, the mesh of which would winnow the loyal from the disloyal." John Graham, Laird of Claverhouse was commissioned to carry out the orders of the Privy Council and was responsible for various summary executions which earned him the name "Bluidy Clavers" by the Covenanters.
|
|
He ultimately admitted to performing five castrations (he also kept "the trophies," in jars labelled with dates, initials, and an L or R). On April 12, 1999, Judge Mark McIntosh sentenced Bodkin to four years in jail, with two- and-a-half years suspended and credit for 69 days served. In a prepared statement, Bodkin said: > I felt it prudent to spare the court unnecessary time considerations and > graphic details regarding this case. Such details might be repugnant to some > and a source of folly for others ... My activities were conducted at the > specific request of the parties ... to absolve emotional, psychological or > physical needs ... not merely the spurious fancy of some alternate > lifestyle. Bodkin was arrested in August 2011 by the Elmore County Sheriff's Office.
|
|
The matter came before Goldstone J, who granted the application, holding that the applicants' membership of the pension scheme entitled them to a hearing before they could be dismissed, in accordance with the principles of natural justice enshrined in the maxim audi alteram partem. He stated, > That someone in the position of Mrs Mokoena or the other applicants who were > members of the pension scheme can be dismissed and the right to their > pension thereby destroyed on the whim of an official and without enquiry, > must be repugnant to any reasonable and decent person. The unfairness of it > is really patent.917G. He consequently held that the applicants were entitled to a hearing before a decision was taken to terminate their employment and so destroy their right to a pension upon retirement.
|
|
The Constitution empowers the Governor to withhold royal assent in cases where the legislation appears to him or her to be repugnant to or inconsistent with the Constitution or affects the rights and privileges of the Legislative Assembly or the Royal Prerogative, or matters reserved to the Governor by article 55.Constitution article 78 The executive authority of the Cayman Islands is vested in the Queen and is exercised by the Government, consisting of the Governor and the Cabinet.Constitution article 43 There is an office of the Deputy Governor, who must be a Caymanian and have served in a senior public office. The Deputy Governor is the acting Governor when the office of Governor is vacant, or the Governor is not able to discharge his or her duties or is absent from the Cayman Islands.
|
|
In May 1898, Trump and Levin moved to Bennett, British Columbia, a town known for prospectors building boats in order to travel to Dawson. In Bennett, Trump and Levin opened the Arctic Restaurant and Hotel, which offered fine dining, lodging and sex in a sea of tents. The Arctic was also originally housed in a tent, but demand for the hotel and restaurant grew until it occupied a two-story building. A letter to the Yukon Sun newspaper described the Arctic: > For single men the Arctic has excellent accommodations as well as the best > restaurant in Bennett, but I would not advise respectable women to go there > to sleep as they are liable to hear that which would be repugnant to their > feelings – and uttered, too, by the depraved of their own sex.
|
|
It also enacted that all laws, bylaws, usages or customs in current or future use in the plantations, which are found to be repugnant to the navigation acts in any way, are to be declared illegal, null and void. The act additionally declared that all persons or their heirs claiming any right or property "in any Islands or Tracts of Land upon the Continent of America by Charter or Letters Patent shall not in the future alienate, sell or dispose of any of the Islands, Tracts of Land, or Proprieties other than to the Natural Born Subjects of England, Ireland, Dominion of Wales or Town of Berwick upon Tweed without the License and Consent of His Majesty". Colonial-born subjects were not mentioned. Such a sale must be signified by a prior Order in Council.
|
|
Bannister was appointed the first attorney-general of New South Wales in March 1823, and he arrived in Sydney early in 1824. On 17 May 1824, he was sworn in at the first sitting of the Supreme Court of New South Wales. He had been given a salary of £1,200 a year with the right to practise as a barrister, but he became discontented with his position; in October 1825, he was in conflict with Governor Thomas Brisbane on the question whether he was bound to draft a bill which seemed to him to be repugnant to the laws of England. Bannister appeared to have taken his office and his responsibilities far too seriously; and, though Governor Ralph Darling spoke of Bannister as "often misled by an injudicious zeal, but indefatigable, conscientious and honourable in the highest degree", Bannister found it extremely difficult to work with him.
|
|
This included references to the judgement of Gummow and Crennan JJ where their Honours said at [111]: > As a general proposition, it may be accepted that legislation which requires > a court exercising federal jurisdiction to depart to a significant degree > from the methods and standards which have characterised judicial activities > in the past may be repugnant to Ch III. Bleby J also cited the dissent of Kirby J in Thomas v Mowbray where his Honour said at [366]: > Requiring such courts, as of ordinary course, to issue orders ex parte, that > deprive an individual of basic civil rights, on the application of officers > of the Executive Branch of Government and upon proof to the civil standard > alone that the measures are reasonably necessary to protect the public from > a future terrorist act, departs from the manner in which, for more than a > century, the judicial power of the Commonwealth has been exercised under the > Constitution. The State of South Australia then appealed that decision to the High Court of Australia.
|
|