But while Goliath is replete with well-researched stories, the book is argumentatively incomplete and oversimplified.
|
|
Would you argumentatively say, I have said this, I think you know this, that I felt like these companies have weaponized everything and amplified it at the same time.
|
|
Novel forms of intellectual production and dissemination — more politically oriented think tanks, new journals of scholarly debate and opinion, more argumentatively structured media — now began to move ideas more aggressively into circulation.
|
|
Proponents of discourse ethics argue that the very act of discourse implies certain "oughts", that is, certain presuppositions that are necessarily accepted by the participants in discourse, and can be used to further derive prescriptive statements. They therefore argue that it is incoherent to argumentatively advance an ethical position on the basis of the is–ought problem, which contradicts these implied assumptions.
|
|
At a dinner to celebrate Pitt's birthday in 1802, Canning wrote the song "The Pilot that Weathered the Storm", performed by a tenor from Drury Lane, Charles Dignum: In November Canning spoke out openly in support of Pitt in the Commons. One observer thought that Canning made incomparably the best speech and that his defence of Pitt's administration "one of the best things, either argumentatively as to matter, or critically and to manner and style" that he could ever remember.Hinde (1973), p. 112.
|
|
Hooker paid frequent visits, and in January 1847 when Darwin was particularly ill Hooker took away a copy of the "Essay". After some delays he sent a page of notes, giving the calm critical feedback that Darwin needed. He did not go along with Darwin's rejection of continuing Creation, arguing "All allusions to superintending providence unnecessary – The Creator able to make first [organisms] able also to go on directing & [it's] a matter of moonshine to [the] argument whether he does or no." Their debates continued, sometimes argumentatively, and Darwin felt devastated by Hooker's intention to set off on a survey voyage.
|
|
Whereas Nell was too sick to complain about his controlling behaviour, some historians believe Edith stood up to him argumentatively. She may have suffered violent, uncontrolled rages as Gissing claimed in letters to Bertz, but the truth is elusive at this distance in time. Gissing took revenge (or acted to protect their older child from continual violent assaults, since he stated in letters his safety was in danger) in April 1896, when Walter was spirited away without Edith's knowledge and sent to stay with Gissing's sisters in Wakefield. Gissing pleaded Edith's violence, but he strongly disliked the way she presented him to his son.
|
|
The task for each subject USE test consists of two parts (with the exception of the ones in mathematics and literature): I and II. The I part contains tasks in which student must give a short written answer, usually several letters or numbers. The II part contains one or several tasks in which student must use their creativity to complete them. For example, one can be given a hard mathematical exercise to solve, a composition to write or a question to answer argumentatively. Unlike the previous part, which is checked by a computer, this part is checked by three experts of the regional examination committee.
|
|
Antiprocess occurs because: # The mind is capable of multitasking; # The mind has the innate capability to evaluate and select information at a preconscious level so that we are not overwhelmed with the processing requirements; # It is not feasible to maintain two contradictory beliefs at the same time; # It is not possible for people to be aware of every factor leading up to decisions they make; # People learn argumentatively effective but logically invalid defensive strategies (such as rhetorical fallacies); # People tend to favour strategies of thinking that have served them well in the past; and # The truth is just too unpalatable to the mind to accept. The ramifications of these factors are that people can be engaged in a debate sincerely, yet the appearances suggest that they are not. This can lead to acrimony if neither party is aware of antiprocess and does not adjust his or her debating style accordingly.
|
|