How to use non liability in a sentence? Find typical usage patterns (collocations)/phrases/context for "non liability" and check conjugation/comparative form for "non liability". Mastering all the usages of "non liability" from sentence examples published by news publications.
The general idea is to find someone who complements the candidate's qualities but is also utterly safe, a non-liability that enrages no core constituencies.
|
|
It does not contain general norms of liability or non-liability applicable to categories of actors.
|
|
The Price's owned a 17 ft Searay boat, which they placed with Sports Marine to sell on their behalf. The Price's agreed to a non liability clause with Sports Marine. Whilst the boat was at Sports Marine, one of their staff damaged the boat during the test run, damage which Sports Marine argued that the non liability clause stopped them for being liable. The Prices argued that the CGA makes such clauses unenforceable regarding consumer transactions.
|
|
Every time he was in the mountains, he had to give the government a non-liability certificate saying that he absolve them of all responsibilities should anything happen to him. He has entered the oxygen-depleted death zone above 8,000 m, twenty times. He spent 35 years in the Indian Army. Lieutenant General V. R. Raghavan, commanding officer of Operation Meghdoot, called Colonel Kumar 'a mountain of information'.
|
|
Carter Holt entered into a contract with ECNZ (now Genesis Energy) for them to construct a cogeneration plant at their Kinleith paper mill that would be fueled by waste byproduct from the mill, with the contract having a non liability clause. ECNZ in turn subcontracted the work to Rolls Royce. Problems later were experienced with the generators that were installed, and CHH sued ECNZ for breach of contract. As there was no contract between CHH and Rolls Royce, they were sued for negligence in tort.
|
|
The chapters deal with the following topics: Chapter I - General Provisions Chapter II - Constitution and Mode of Liability Chapter III - Non-liability and Diminished Liability Chapter IV - Special Provisions on the Subject of Liability Chapter V - Product Liability Chapter VI - Motor Vehicle Accident Liability Chapter VII - Medical Damage Liability Chapter VIII - Environmental Pollution Liability Chapter IX - High Risk Liability Chapter X - Liability for Damage Caused by Domesticated Animals Chapter XI - Object Damage Liability Chapter XII - Supplementary Provisions Article 54 allows individuals to sue doctors for medical malpractice. Article 65 allows for tort liability when pollution of the environment leads to damages .
|
|
Applications for declaratory relief in other areas have become more widespread, particularly in Europe. A key feature in relation to this development has been the Brussels and Lugano Conventions on civil jurisdiction and judgments relating to members of the European Economic Area (EEA). In certain circumstances, jurisdiction is awarded under the conventions to the courts first seised of the matter. This has led to a rise in defendants taking pre-emptive action by seeking "declarations of non-liability" in a race to the courthouse to ensure that they choose the court first seised rather than waiting for the claimant to do so.
|
|
Rule provides for the selection of jurors and rule governs the number of jurors in a civil case. A civil jury must consist of between six and twelve jurors (six jurors are presently used in the vast majority of federal civil trials; juries of twelve are still required in federal criminal cases). Rule provides for use of "special verdicts" in jury trials, under which the jury may be asked to respond to specific questions rather than just finding liability or non- liability and determining the amount of the damages, if any. Rule addresses situations in which a case is so one-sided that the court may grant "judgment as a matter of law" taking the case from the jury.
|
|
On 5 February 2010, it was announced that he would be charged with offences under section 17 of the Theft Act 1968 relating to false accounting in relation to claims for Parliamentary expenses and on 27 May he and other politicians appeared at Southwark Crown Court for a preliminary hearing. Following the failure of the attempt by the group to claim parliamentary privilege (dismissed either in the Court of Appeal or in United Kingdom Supreme Court),The U.K. Supreme Court ruling 1 December 2010 distinguishes between the non-liability – from the "freedom of speech" stated in the Bill of Rights of 1689 – and the power of Parliament to protect its components in their right to discuss in complete autonomy and freedom, without any interference from anyone (exclusive cognisance): on 3 December 2010 he immediately pleaded guilty to three counts of false accounting involving approximately £18,000 and was released on bail until a sentencing hearing in January 2011. Among the charges was that he had claimed rent on a flat in Westminster which he in fact owned, using a fake tenancy agreement. On 7 January 2011, Chaytor was sentenced by Mr Justice Saunders sitting in the Crown Court at Southwark to 18 months' imprisonment.
|
|
No results under this filter, show 9 sentences.